Abstract
Globalization has enormous implications. As convergence of technologies facilitated people to connect, people not only communicated but also started collaborating. A flat world that facilitates multiple forms of collaboration in sharing knowledge and work among billions of people without regard to geography, distance or language poses new challenges and problems for lawmakers and judges. When billions of people connect and collaborate and generate value in goods and services horizontally rather than vertically, complex issues are bound to arise. Such disputes emerge in the shape of challenges, which can be called global. Now global challenges demand global solutions as well. Individual countries find themselves unable to deal with such problems, and the problems are such that they cannot be ignored. Handling them together is the obvious and only way to ensure that they are properly tackled. It would be possible when the entire world’s people have a stake and all enjoy the opportunity to participate. We all share one atmosphere where overexploitation of the environment in the industrialized countries can result in ecosystem destruction. In developing a workable and effective international legal system, participation of all states is required. Lastly, we are all part of a human community. So we need to consider our actions accordingly. And to do so from a script that is written afresh every day by billions of human beings with whom we all share our planet raises demand for the formulation of a global civic ethic grounded in universally shared values and expressed in interlocking rights and responsibilities. Present paper intends to explore the possibility of such an ethics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Oxford English Dictionary (1989). Oxford: Clarenton, p. 6254
For example, the term ‘Globalization’ is ‘lil’ alam’ in Arabic, ‘quanqiuhua’ in Chinese, ‘mondialisation’ in French, ‘globalizatsia’ in Russian, and ‘globalizacion’ in Spanish. In some minor languages also we come across the term – ‘globalisaatio’ in Finnish, ‘bishwavyapikaran’ in Napalese and ‘vaishvikaran’ in Hindi.
‘Questioning Globalization – a Forum 2000’ meeting in Czech Republic arrived at the consensus that world economic is not feasible without world ethics.
Kant, cited in Denker, R. (1974). Kant’s theory of the three-fold path of world peace—or the purposes of nature in history. In Eduard Gerresheim (Ed.). Immanuel Kant (p.12). Bonn-Bad Godesberg.
Peter Singer, One world: ethics of globalization, cited in Jeffrey Eisenberg, Ethics, morality and globalization. www.http://shalomplace.org/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/16110765/m/76410285. Accessed on 6 December, 2003.
Peter Singer, One world: ethics of globalization, cited in The complete review’s review. http://www.complete-review.com/reviews/divphil/singerp1.htm. Accessed on 6 December, 2003.
References
Bentham, J. (1948). An introduction to the principals of morals and legislation (p. 326). London: Hafne.
Booth, K., Dunne, T., & Cox, M. (Eds.). (2001). How might we live? Global ethics in the new century (Introduction, p. 1). New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
Ebejuwa, T. (2004). Towards universal values. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, XXI(2), 56.
Frost, M. (2008). Global ethics: anarchy, freedom and international relations. New York: Routledge.
Heiddegger, M. (1971). The thing. In Poetry, language and thought (pp. 165–166). New York.
Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harward University Press.
Reiser, O.L. & Davies, B. (1944). Planetary democracy: An introduction to scientific humanism (pp. 212, 219). New York.
Robertson, R., Smelser, & Baltes, P. B. (2001). Globality. In International encyclopedia of social and behavioural sciences (p. 6254). Oxford: Elsevier/Pergamon.
Shiva, V. (2000). Ecological balance in an era of globalization. In N. Low (Ed.), Global Ethics and Environment (p. 48). New York: Routledge.
Suganami, H. (1978). A note on the origin of the word “International”. British Journal of International Studies, IV(3), 226–232.
Webster. (1961). Webster’s third new international dictionary of the English language unabridged (p. 965). Springfield: M.A. Merriam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, A. Ethics of Globalization: Challenges and Prospects. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 32, 165–174 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-015-0012-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-015-0012-z