Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

(Re)Presentations of Gender and Ethnicity in Diversity Statements on European Company Websites

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates how specific notions of gender and ethnicity are integrated into diversity discourses presented on 241 top European company websites. Large European companies increasingly disclose equality and diversity policies in statements on websites. Such statements may be used to promote an ethical image of the company in terms of how well it manages diversity and guards against discrimination. In this paper, we argue that diversity statement discourses are important as they play a key part in socially constructing how diversity should be regarded in the company by minority and majority groups, as well as indicating corporate values to external stakeholders (investors, government, community, press etc.). Sometimes, the notions of gender or ethnic diversity are positioned as a liability in need of protection, whilst in others, as a source of competitive advantage. We find evidence of use of discursive tools such as problematisation, rationalisation, fixation, reframing and naturalisation of the notions of gender and ethnic diversity, reinforced by use of symbols, such as statistics, photographs, membership badges and awards. Few statements directly associate gender and ethnic diversity with enhanced corporate performance. We found that diversity statements sometimes appear to reinforce existing business stereotypes of women and people from ethnic minorities, and in a few discourses, create new ones, particularly evident in photographs illustrating the diversity web pages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker J. (2002). Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organisations. Gender and Society 4(2), 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M., Karreman D. (2000). Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations Through Discourse Analysis. Human Relations 53(9), 1125–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson C., Imperia G. (1992). The Corporate Annual Report: A Photo Analysis of Male and Female Portrayals. The Journal of Business Communication 29(2), 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellard E. and C.-C. Rüling: 2001, Reflections and Projections of Boundaries in the Diversity Management Discourses in the United-States, France and Germany. Paper Presented at the 17th EGOS Colloquium, Lyon, France.

  • Benschop Y., Meihuizen H. E. (2002). Keeping Up Gendered Appearances: Representations of Gender in Financial Annual Reports. Accounting Organisation and Society 27: 611–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dass A. P., Parker B. (1999). Strategies for Managing Human Resource Diversity: From Resistance to Learning. Academy of Management Executive 13(2), 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N. (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N. (2005). Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism. Organization Studies 26(6), 915–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy C., Palmer I., Phillips N. (2000). Discourse as a Strategic Resource. Human Relations 53(9), 1227–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch M. J. (1993). The Dynamics of Organizational Culture. Academy of Management Review 18(4), 657–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijltjes M., Olie R., Glunk U. (2003). Internationalization of Top Management Teams in Europe. European Management Journal 21(1), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein M. (2004). Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What do They Say? Journal of Business Ethics 50(1), 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby E. L., Harter L. M. (2003). Speaking the Language of the Bottom-line: The Metaphor of “Managing Diversity”. Journal of Business Communication 40(1), 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan T., et al. (2003). The Effects of Diversity on Business Performance: Report of the Diversity Research Network. Human Resource Management 42(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krefting L. (2003). Re-presenting Women Executives: Valorization and Devalorization in Us Business Press. Women in Management Review 17(3/4), 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liff S. (1999). Diversity and Equal Opportunities: Room for a Constructive Compromise. Human Resource Management Journal 9(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorbiecki A., Jack G. (2000). Critical Turns in The Evolution of Diversity Management. British Journal of Management 11(special issue), S17–S31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lymer A.: 1996, ‘The use of the internet for corporate reporting – a discussion of the issues and survey of current usage in the UK’, On-line article. http://www. shu.ac.uk/schools/fsl/fisjnl/vol1996/pprs1997/lymer 97.htm.

  • Phillips L., Jørgensen M. W. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Point S., Singh V. (2003). Defining and Dimensionalising Diversity: Evidence from Corporate Websites Across Europe. European Management Journal 21(6), 750–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell Reynolds & Associates (2002). What Makes an Effective Board? Views from FTSE Chairmen. Russell Reynolds & Associates, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh V. (2004). Report on Ethnic Diversity of FTSE 100 Directors. Report for Department of Trade & Industry, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh V., Point S. (2004). Strategic Responses to the Human Resource Diversity Challenge: An On-line European Top Company Comparison. Long Range Planning 37(4), 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V., Vinnicombe S. (2003). The 2003 Female FTSE Report: Women Pass the Milestone. 101 Women Directors on FTSE 100 Boards. Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman M.C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara E., Kleymann B., Seristö H. (2004). Strategies as Discursive Constructions: The Case of Airline Alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter S., Saunders C., Hart P. (2002). Electronic Window-Dressing: Impression Management on Websites. European Journal of Information Systems 12(4), 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Val Singh.

Additional information

Val Singh received her PhD from Cranfield School of Management, where she is Senior Research Fellow in Organisational Behaviour. Her research areas include corporate governance and diversity; women directors’ careers, gender and ethnic diversity management, work/life balance, mentoring; role models, networking and impression management. She is Gender Section Editor of the Journal of Business Ethics, Associate Editor of Gender Work & Organization, and has published widely in both academic and practitioner journals. She has been a judge of the UK National Business Awards since 2003.

Sébastien Point received his PhD in management from Institut d’ Administration des Entreprises, Lyon, France. He is currently Lecturer in Human Resource Management and International Management at the Université de Franche-Comté(France). He is also Visiting Fellow at Cranfield School of Management (UK). His research interests include diversity managment, organisational discourse and impression managemnt. Current research centers on analysing organisational discourse, through both corporate annual reports and websites, often with cross-national comparisons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, V., Point, S. (Re)Presentations of Gender and Ethnicity in Diversity Statements on European Company Websites. J Bus Ethics 68, 363–379 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9028-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9028-2

Keywords

Navigation