Abstract
This article uses a reading of John Wesley's Primitive Physic, or An Easy and Natural Method of Curing Most Diseases (1747) to resist the common rejection—often as "quackery"—of Wesley's treatments for common maladies. We engage Wesley not because he was right but because his approach offers useful moments of pause in light of contemporary medical epistemology. Wesley's recommendations were primarily oriented towards the categories of personal responsibility and capability, but he also sought to empower individuals—especially the poor—with the knowledge to safely and affordably treat maladies of their own. We leverage Primitive Physic to rethink contemporary medical knowledge production, especially as sanctioned by randomized clinical trials and legitimate views of experience and contemporary institutions such as the AMA. Ultimately, we suggest that the medical humanities has a key role to play in mining the discarded and dismissed for what they can tell scholars about medical knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, Jeanne E. 2013. Revolutionary Medicine. New York: NYU Press.
Boyle, Eric W. 2013. Quack Medicine: A History of Combating Health Fraud in Twentieth-century America. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Chaplin, Arnold. 1920. The History of Medical Education in the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, 1500-1850. Royal Society of Medicine.
Cracknell, Kenneth, and Susan J. White. 2005. An Introduction to World Methodism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benjamin, Marina. 1990. “Medicine, Morality and the Politics of Berkeley’s Tar-water.” In The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century, edited by Andrew Cunningham and R. K. French, 165-93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berlant, Jeffrey. 1975. Profession and Monopoly: A Study of Medicine in the United States and Great Britain. University of California Press.
Bellinghieri, Guido, et al. 2004. “Therapy of Kidney Diseases in Poor People in France during the 18th Century.” Journal of Nephrology 17:619.
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2010. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cunningham, Andrew, and Roger French, eds. 2006. The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2009. Bright-sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking has Undermined America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
_____. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.
_____. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Edited by Colin Gordon. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Gerss, Joachim Werner Otto and Köpcke, Wolfgang. 2010. “Clinical Trials and Rare Diseases.” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 686:173-90.
Gevitz, Norman. 1988. Other Healers: Unorthodox Medicine in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Habermas Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hawes, William. 2010 [1776]. An Examination of the Rev. Mr. John Wesley’s Primitive Physic. London: Eighteenth Century Collections Online Print Editions.
Hill, Alfred W. 1958. Wesley among the Physicians. London: Epworth Press.
Holifield, E. Brooks. 1986. Health and Medicine in the Methodist Tradition: Journey toward Wholeness. New York: Crossroad.
Hughes, Melanie Dobson. 2008. “The Holistic Way: John Wesley’s Practical Piety as a Resource for Integrated Healthcare.” Journal of Religion and Health 47: 237–52.
Institute of Medicine. 2001. “Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century.” Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Institute of Medicine. 2006. “The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public.” Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. doi: 10.17226/11750.
Jena A. B., et al. 2015. “Mortality and Treatment Patterns among Patients Hospitalized with Acute Cardiovascular Conditions during dates of National Cardiology Meetings.” JAMA Internal Medicine 175 (2): 237-244.
KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). 2007. “Snapshots: How Changes in Medical Technology affect Health Care Costs.” March 2. http://kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/snapshots-how-changes-in-medical-technology-affect/.
Kaptchuk, Ted J. 2001. “The Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial: Gold Standard or Golden Calf?” Annals of Scholarship 54 (6): 541-9.
Kazdin, Alan E. 2010. Single-case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lovett, Robert. 1915. “Percival Pott, his Times and his Work.” Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 172:807-812.
Madden, Deborah, ed. 2008. Inward and Outward Health: John Wesley’s Holistic Concept of Medical Science, the Environment and Holy Living. London: Epworth.
Maddox, Randy L. 2007. “John Wesley on Holistic Health and Healing.” Methodist History 46 (1): 4-33.
_____. 2008. “Reclaiming the Eccentric Parent: Methodist Reception of John Wesley’s Interest in Medicine.” In Inward and Outward Health: John Wesley’s Holistic Concept of Medical Science, the Environment, and Holy Living, edited by Deborah Madden, 15-50. London: Epworth.
Merriam Webster Online, s.v. “randomized clinical trial,” accessed May 22, 2015. http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/randomized%20controlled%20trial.
Ott, Philip Wesley. 1980. “John Wesley on Health: A Word for Sensible Regimen.” Methodist History 18:193–204.
Poen, Monte. 1979. Harry S. Truman versus the Medical Lobby: The Genesis of Medicare. Columbia, MO: The University of Missouri Press.
Porter, Roy. 1985. “The Patient’s View: Doing Medical History from Below.” Theory and Society 14 (2): 175-198.
Porter, T.M. 1992. “Objectivity as Standardization: The Rhetoric of Impersonality in Measurement, Statistics, and Cost-benefit Analysis.” Annals of Scholarship 9:19-60.
Rogal, S. J. 1978. “Pills for the Poor: John Wesley’s Primitive Physick.” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 51 (1): 81–90.
Scott, Joan W. 1991. “The Evidence of Experience.” Critical Inquiry 17 (4): 773-797.
Sloan, A. W. 1996. English Medicine in the 17th Century. Durham: Durham Academic.
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., Campbell, Donald T. 2001. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Florence, KY: Wadsworth.
Shadish William R., et al. 2008. “Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (484): 1334-1343.
Starr, Paul. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.
UMC. 2012. “Health Care for All in the United States.” Accessed May 22, 2015. http://www.umc.org/what-we-believe/health-care-for-all-in-the-united-states.
van Stuijvenberg, M., et al. 1998. “Informed Consent, Parental Awareness, and Reasons for Participating in a Randomised Controlled Study.” Archives of Disease in Childhood 79 (2): 120-5.
Wesley, John W., Reginald Ward and Richard P. Heitzenrater, 1991. John Wesley’s Journal. The Works of John Wesley. Nashville: Abingdon.
Wesley, John. 2003. Primitive Physic: An Easy and Natural Method of Curing most Diseases. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Williams, Ben A. 2010. “Perils of Evidence-based Medicine.” Perspectives on Biology and Medicine 53 (1): 106-20 .
Wolinsky, Howard and Tom Brune. 1994. The Serpent on the Staff: The Unhealthy Politics of the American Medical Association. New York: G.P. Putnam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skinner, D., Schneider, A. Listening to Quackery: Reading John Wesley’s Primitive Physic in an Age of Health Care Reform. J Med Humanit 40, 69–83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-016-9418-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-016-9418-0