On the predicate logics of finite Kripke frames

12Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In [Ono 1987] H. Ono put the question about axiomatizing the intermediate predicate logic LFin characterized by the class of all finite Kripke frames (Problem 4,P41). It was established in [Skvortsov 1988] that LFin is not recursively axiomatizable. One can easily show that for any finite poset M, the predicate logic characterized by M is recursively axiomatizable, and its axiomatization can be constructed effectively from M. Namely, the set of formulas belonging to this logic is recursively enumerable, since it is embeddable in the two-sorted classical predicate calculus CPC2 (the definition of the truth in a Kripke model may be expressed by a formula of CPC2). Thus the logic LFin is II20-arithmetical. Here we give a more explicit II20-description of LFin: it is presented as the intersection of a denumerable sequence of finitely axiomatizable Kripke-complete logics. Namely, we give an axiomatization of the logic LBnPm+ characterized by the class of all posets of the finite height ≤m and the finite branching ≤n. A finite axiomatization of the predicate logic LPm+ characterized by the class of all posets of the height ≤m is known from [Yokota 1989] (this axiomatics is essentially first-order; the standard propositional axiom of the height ≤m is not sufficient [Ono 1983]). We prove that LBnPm+=(LPm++Bn), Bn being the propositional axiom of the branching ≤n (see [Gabbay, de Jongh 1974]). Our terminology and notations mainly correspond to [Ono 1987]. © 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skvortsov, D. (1995). On the predicate logics of finite Kripke frames. Studia Logica, 54(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01058533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free