Abstract
The theory of rational decision has always been implicitly involved with subjunctive and counterfactual conditionals. “If I were to do A, this would happen; if I were to do B that would happen. ” When I have done A, I use the counterfactual: “If I had done B, the outcome would have been worse. ” Counterfactuals are handled so smoothly in decision theory and game theory that they are hardly ever explicitly discussed except in cases where they cause problems. For many philosophers, Newcomb’s paradox was such a critical case (See Gibbard and Harper (1978)). In game theory, questions about beliefs off the equilibrium path in extensive form games and related issues of backward and forward induction provoked explicit discussion of counterfactuals (See Aumann (1995), Bicchieri (1988), Binmore (1987), Harsanyi and Selten (1988), Reny (1993), Stalnaker (1994), (forthcoming)). Where subjunctive conditionals cause problems, we need an explicit theory. What theory should we use? There is the selection function semantics of Stalnaker (1968) based on the idea of “most similar possible world in which the antecedent is true”, and related theories of Woodruff (1969), Lewis (1973), Pollock (1976), Nute (1980), which relax some of Stalnaker’s assumptions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R.J. Aumann, “Backward Induction and Common Knowledge of Rationality”, in: Games and Economic Behavior,8, 1995, pp.6–19.
C. Bicchieri, “Strategic Behavior and Counterfactuals”, in: Synthese,76, 1988, pp.135–169.
K. Binmore, “Modeling Rational Players I and II”, in: Economics and Philosophy,3, 1987, pp.179214 and 4, 1988, pp.9–55.
B. Chellas, “Basic Conditional Logic”, in: Journal of Philosophical Logic,4, 1975, pp.133–228.
A. Gibbard and W. Harper, “Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility”, in: C.A. Hooker et al. (eds.), Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel 1978.
J. Harsanyi and R. Selten, A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1988.
R. Jeffrey, The Logic of Decision. New York: McGraw Hill 1965.
R. Jeffrey, The Logic of Decision. 2nd rev., Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1983. D.K. Lewis, Counterfactuals. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1973.
D. Nute, Topics in Conditional Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel 1980.
J. Pollock, Subjunctive Reasoning. Dordrecht: Reidel 1976.
P. Reny, “Rationality in Extensive Form Games”, in: Journal of Economic Theory,59, 1993, pp.627–649.
L.J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley 1954.
R. Selten and U. Leopold, “Subjunctive Conditionals in Decision and Game Theory”, in: W. Stegmüller et al. (eds.), Philosophy of Economics. Berlin: Springer 1982, pp. 192–200.
B. Skyrms, Pragmatics and Empiricism. New Haven: Yale University Press 1984.
B. Skyrms, “Conditional Chance”, in: J. Fetzer (ed.), Probability and Causality. Dordrecht: Reidel 1988, pp. 161–178.
R.C. Stalnaker, “A Theory of Conditionals”, in: N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell 1968, pp. 98–112.
R.C. Stalnaker, “Letter to Brian Skyrms”, in: E. Fells and B. Skyrms (eds.), Probability and Conditionals: Belief Revision and Rational Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1994, pp. 27–29.
R.C. Stalnaker, “Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games”, in: C. Bicchieri et al. (eds.), The Logic of Norms. New York: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).
P. Woodruff, Notes on Conditional Logic. Working paper University of California, Irvine, 1969. P. Woodruff, Partitions and Conditionals. Working paper University of California, Irvine 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skyrms, B. (1998). Bayesian Subjunctive Conditionals for Games and Decisions. In: Leinfellner, W., Köhler, E. (eds) Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1997], vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1654-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1654-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4992-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1654-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive