Skip to main content
Log in

Harmonising natural deduction

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prawitz proved a theorem, formalising ‘harmony’ in Natural Deduction systems, which showed that, corresponding to any deduction there is one to the same effect but in which no formula occurrence is both the consequence of an application of an introduction rule and major premise of an application of the related elimination rule. As Gentzen ordered the rules, certain rules in Classical Logic had to be excepted, but if we see the appropriate rules instead as rules for Contradiction, then we can extend the theorem to the classical case. Properly arranged there is a thoroughgoing ‘harmony’, in the classical rules. Indeed, as we shall see, they are, all together, far more ‘harmonious’ in the general sense than has been commonly observed. As this paper will show, the appearance of disharmony has only arisen because of the illogical way in which natural deduction rules for Classical Logic have been presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beziau J.-Y. (2005). Paraconsistent logic from a modal viewpoint. Journal of Applied Logic 3:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M. (1991). The logical basis of metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen A. (1987). Natural deduction and Hilbert’s epsilon operator. Journal of Philosophical Logic 16:411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisenring A.C. (1969). Mathematical logic and Hilbert’s epsilon symbol. London, Macdonald

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Viol W.P.M. (1995). Instantial logic. Amsterdam, ILLC

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne P. (2002). Harmony, purity, simplicity and a “seemingly magical fact”. The Monist 85:498–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Mints G.E. (1982). Heyting predicate calculus with epsilon symbol. Journal of Soviet Mathematics 8:317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz D. (1965). Natural deduction. Stockholm, Almqvist and Wiksell

    Google Scholar 

  • Read S. (1988). Relevance logic. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Read S. (2000). Harmony and autonomy in classical logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29:123–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels L. (1977). Cut elimination in a Gentzen-style epsilon calculus without identity. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 23:527–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels L. (1978). A cut-free sequent calculus for Hilbert’s epsilon symbol. Journal of Symbolic Logic 43:525–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuhara M. (1982). Cut elimination in epsilon calculi. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 28:311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Hartley Slater.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slater, B.H. Harmonising natural deduction. Synthese 163, 187–198 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9197-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9197-2

Keywords

Navigation