Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Solution to a problem of Ono and Komori

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. N. D.Belnap, ‘Display Logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1982), pp. 375–417.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. T. Brady, ‘The Decidability of RW’, Paper delivered to the 3rd Paraconsistency Conference, Canberra, 1988. To appear.

  3. J. M.Dunn, ‘Consecution Formulation of Positive R with Co-Tenability and t’, A. R.Anderson and N. D.Belnap (eds.), Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol I, Princeton, P. University Press, 1975, pp. 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. M.Dunn, ‘A “Gentzen System” for Positive Relevant Implication’, abstract, Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (1973), pp. 356–357. (Essentially an abstract of [3].)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.Giambrone, ‘TW + and RW + are Decidable’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (1985), pp. 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Ono and Y. Komori, ‘Logics Without the Contraction Rule’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, pp. 169–201.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, GPO Box 4, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    John Slaney

Authors
  1. John Slaney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slaney, J. Solution to a problem of Ono and Komori. J Philos Logic 18, 103–111 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296176

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296176

Search

Navigation