Skip to main content
Log in

Activities: States or Events?

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aristar-Dry, H.: 1983, ‘The Movement of Narrative Time’, Journal of Literary Semantics 12, 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1981, ‘On Time, Tense and Aspect: An Essay Concerning English Metaphysics’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1986, ‘The Algebra of Events’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. and B. Partee: 1972, Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B.: 1976, Aspect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraetere, I.: 1995, ‘On the Necessity of Distinguishing between (Un)boundedness and (A)telicity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1979, World Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1986, ‘The Effects of Aspectual Class on the Temporal Structure of Discourse: Semantics or Pragmatics?’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flier, M.: 1985, ‘The Scope of Prefixal Delimitation in Russian’, in M. Flier and A. Timberlake (eds.), The Scope of Slavic Aspect, UCLA Slavic Studies, Volume 12, Slavica Press, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, W.: 1990, About Time, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, A.: 1984, The Logic of Aspect: An Axiomatic Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R.: 1990, ‘First Principles Organize Attention to and Learning about Relevant Data: NUmber and the Animate/Inanimate Distinction’, Cognitive Science 14, 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatav, G.: 1989, ‘Aspects, Aktionsarten, and the Time Line’, Linguistics 27, 487–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinämäki, O.: 1974, The Semantics of English Temporal Connectives, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas.

  • Heinämäki, O.: 1984, ‘Aspect in Finnish’, in C. deGroot and H. Tommalo (eds.), Aspect Bound, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herweg, M.: 1991, ‘Perfective and Imperfective Aspect and the Theory of Events and States’, Linguistics 29, 969–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, E.: 1981/1986, ‘Temporal Anaphora in Discourse’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesperson, O.: 1931, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part IV, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. and C. Rohrer: 1983, ‘Tense in Texts’, in R. Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A.: 1963, Action, Emotion, and Will, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1989, ‘Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics’, in R. Bartsch et al. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1992, ‘Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution’, in I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. and J. Waletzky: 1966, ‘Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience’, in J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Meeting of the American Ethnological Association, Seattle, University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M.: 1988, ‘The Necessity of Illusion: Perception and Thought in Infancy’, in L. Weiskrantz (ed.), Thought without Language, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M.: 1994, ‘ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and Domain Specificity’, in L. Hirschfield and S. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittwoch, A.: 1991, ‘In Defense of Vendler's Achievements’, Belgian Journal of Linguistics 71–85.

  • Moens, M. and M. Steedman: 1987, ‘Temporal Ontology in Natural Language’, in Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford, California.

  • Mourelatos, A.: 1978, ‘Events, Processes, and States’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 415–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’, Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñon, C.: 1993, ‘Aspectual Composition and the ‘Pofective’ in Polish’, unpublished paper, read at the Slavic Linguistics Conference, MIT.

  • Piñon, C.: 1995, An Ontology for Event Semantics, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Pustejovsky, J.: 1991, ‘The Syntax of Event Structure’, Cognition 41, 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilder, F.: 1997, Temporal Relations in English and German Narrative Discourse, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Edinburgh.

  • Smith, C. S.: 1977, ‘The Vagueness of Sentences in Isolation,’ in W. Beach et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.

  • Smith, C. S.: 1983, ‘A Theory of Aspectual Choice’, Language 59, 479–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. S.: 1991, The Parameter of Aspect, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. S.: 1993/5, ‘The Range of Aspectual Situation Types: Shifts and a Bounding Paradox’, in P. Bertinetto et al. (eds.), Temporal Reference: Aspect and Actionality, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. S.: 1995, ‘The Relation between Aspectual Viewpoint and Situation Type’, Address to the Linguistic Society of America; Eric electronic database.

  • Taylor, B.: 1977, ‘Tense and Continuity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Z.: 1957, ‘Verbs and Times’, The Philosophical Review; reprinted 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

  • Verkuyl, H.: 1993, A Theory of Aspectuality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlach, F.: 1981, ‘The Semantics of the Progressive’, in P. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 14: Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlach, F.: 1993, ‘Temporal Adverbials, Tenses, and the Perfect’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 231–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B.: 1956, ‘Grammatical Categories,’ in J. Carroll (ed.), Language, Thought, and Reality, Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, MIT Press and John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, C.S. Activities: States or Events?. Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 479–508 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005439826271

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005439826271

Keywords

Navigation