Notes
Hans Küng exploits the notions of paradigms and paradigm shift for a theory of interreligious dialogue inTheology for the Third Millennium: An Ecumenical View, trans. Peter Heinegg (New York: Doubleday, 1988), esp. pp. 210–212.
Raimundo Panikkar, ‘Faith and Belief: A Multireligious Experience’,Anglican Theological Review 53 (1971), p. 223.
For a fuller analysis, see my ‘What Is It to Question?’,Soundings 75 (Spring 1992), pp. 129–146.
Cf. John Dunne's notion of ‘passing over’, ‘a going over to the standpoint of another culture, another way of life, another religion ⋯ followed by an equal and opposite process we might call “coming back”, coming back with new insight to one's own culture, one's own way of life, one's own religion’ —The Way of All the Earth (New York: Macmillan, 1972), p. ix, quoted in Knitter, p. 206.
Knitter, p. 212; Panikkar, p. 225, and inThe Intrareligious Dialogue (New York: Paulist Press, 1978); Wilfred Cantwell Smith,Faith and Belief (Princeton: University Press, 1979); John B. Cobb, Jr.,Christ in a Pluralistic Age (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1984).
Panikkar, p. 220.
Jean Calvin, the 87th Sermon on Deuteronomy (on Deut. 13), inSermons on Deuteronomy, trans. Arthur Golding [1583] (Banner of Truth Trust, 1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, S.G. Bowl climbing: The logic of religious question rivalry. Int J Philos Relig 36, 27–43 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01314199
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01314199