Skip to main content
Log in

Character, blameworthiness, and blame: comments on George Sher’s In Praise of Blame

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his recent book, In Praise of Blame, George Sher argues (among other things) that a bad act can reflect negatively on a person if that act results in an appropriate way from that person’s “character,” and defends a novel “two-tiered” account of what it is to blame someone. In these brief comments, I raise some questions and doubts about each of these aspects of his rich and thought-provoking account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sher (2006).

  2. Christine Korsgaard gives a nice description of the view I do not mean to be endorsing when she writes, “When you deliberate it is as if there were something over and above all of your desires, something which is you, and which chooses which desire to act on” (Korsgaard 1996: 100). Sher is in my view rightly critical of this view on pp. 36–38.

  3. I have argued for this claim in a number of places. See, for example, Smith (2004, 2005).

  4. Here I follow the account of blameworthiness defended by T. M. Scanlon (1998) in Chapter 6, esp. pp. 272–273. I have explored these ideas further in two places: Smith (2007a, b).

  5. I spell out some of these conditions more fully in Smith (2007a).

  6. I am grateful to Sandra Reiter for very helpful discussion on this point. This understanding of the particular force of judgments of blameworthiness traces back, again, to the work of T. M. Scanlon, and is also illuminatingly explicated and defended in Hieronymi (2004).

  7. Elizabeth Beardsley wrote a series of interesting articles in the 1960s and early ’70s exploring some of these ambiguities. See, for example, Beardsley (1969, 1971).

  8. I find the propriety of the locution “I blame P for X” remarkably puzzling. Do I “blame” Bill Clinton for cheating on Hillary? I find it odd to say so, though I certainly judge him blameworthy for his behavior toward her, think poorly of him on the basis of it, and think he is subject to legitimate criticism for it. Do I “blame” Saddam Hussein for his horrible treatment of his citizens? Again, I find it somewhat odd to say so, but here I have even stronger emotional reactions of disgust and outrage. This leads me to think that we will not find helpful clues about what’s involved in “blaming” a person, as distinct from “judging him blameworthy” by looking at our use of these expressions.

References

  • Beardsley, E. (1969). A plea for deserts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 6(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley, E. (1971). Moral disapproval and moral indignation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 31, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hieronymi, P. (2004). The force and fairness of blame. Philosophical Perspectives, 18(1), 115–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. (1996). Sources of normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, G. (2006). In praise of blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2004). Conflicting attitudes, moral agency, and conceptions of the self. Philosophical Topics, 32(1 & 2), 331–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2005). Responsibility for attitudes: Activity and passivity in mental life. Ethics, 115(2), 236–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2007a). On being responsible and holding responsible. Journal of Ethics, 11(4), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2007b). Control, responsibility, and moral assessment. Philosophical Studies. doi: 10.1007/s11098-006-9048-x.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela M. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, A.M. Character, blameworthiness, and blame: comments on George Sher’s In Praise of Blame . Philos Stud 137, 31–39 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9165-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9165-1

Keywords

Navigation