Skip to main content
Log in

Kantifying in

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adams, R. M.: 1979, ‘Primitive thisness and primitive identity’,The Journal of Philosophy 76, 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böer, S. E. and Lycan, W. G.: 1975, ‘Knowing who’,Philosophical Studies 28, 299–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1969,Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1975,The Intentions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1975, ‘How to Russell a Frege-Church’,The Journal of Philosophy 72, 716–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1979, ‘Dthat’ and ‘On the logic of demonstratives’,Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 2, Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language.

  • Kraut, R.: 1982, ‘Sensory states and sensory objects’Noûs 16, 277–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1963, ‘Semantical considerations on modal logic’,Acta Philosophical Fennica 16; reprinted in L. Linsky (ed.)Reference and Modality, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

  • Kripke, S.: 1972, ‘Naming and necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.),Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, E.: 1981, ‘Quantifier phrases are (at least) five ways ambiguous in intensional contexts’, in Frank Heny (ed.),Ambiguities in Intensional Contexts, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, E.: 1982, ‘How to Frege a Russell-Kaplan’,Noûs 16, 253–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, E.: (forthcoming), ‘Hintikka on quantifying in and trans-world identity’.

  • Saarinen, E.: (forthcoming), ‘De re attitudes, directly referential terms, and metaphysics’.

  • Smith, D. W.: 1979, ‘The case of the exploding perception’,Synthese 41, 239–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W.: 1981a, ‘The Ortcutt connection’, in Frank Heny (ed.)Ambiguities in Intensional Contexts, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W.: 1981b, ‘Indexical sense and reference’,Synthese 49, 101–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W.: 1982, ‘What's the meaning of “this”?’,Noûs 16, 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W.: (forthcoming), ‘Objects and worlds of thought in the philosophy of Hintikka’, in Radu Bogdan (ed.),Profiles volume on Jaakko Hintikka.

  • Smith, D. W.: (forthcoming), Review of Jaakko Hintikka'sThe Intentions of Intentionality, inTopoi.

  • Smith, D. W. and McIntyre, R.: 1982,Intentionality and Intensions, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D.W. Kantifying in. Synthese 54, 261–273 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869394

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869394

Navigation