Abstract
Numerical techniques and measurement procedures are proposed for processing nominal (or qualitative) data in situations where coders must assign observations or data to categories in an a priori classification scheme. Such situations arise most commonly in survey research, where data from open-ended questions must be rendered compatible with the requirements for computerized data sets. These techniques have the advantage of allowing the coder to make categories flexible rather than hard-edged. They also provide statistical guidelines for assessing the relative empirical worth of researchers' category schemes.
The framework within which the techniques are developed is based on the theory of fuzzy sets. The fundamental concept involved is that an element may belong partially to a set rather than belonging either totally or not at all, and an element may belong partially to more than one set simultaneously. Topics covered in the paper include: P ]
-
(1)
Measuring the degree of coder ambiguity about category membership of data;
-
(2)
Evaluating the fuzziness of category schemes;
-
(3)
Diagnosing the sources of fuzziness in such schemes; and
-
(4)
The multivariate analysis of fuzzy nominal data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bezdek, J. C.: 1974, ‘Numerical Taxonomy with Fuzzy Sets’. Journal of Mathematical Biology 1, pp. 57–71.
Bultez, Alain V. and Naert, P. A.: 1975, ‘Consistent Sum-Constrained Models’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70, pp. 529–535.
Feller, William: 1971, ‘An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications’. Vol. II, second edition. New York, Wiley.
Kaufmann, A.: 1975, ‘Theory of Fuzzy Sets’. Vol. I. New York, Academic Press.
Kay, Paul and McDaniel, Chad. K.: 1975, ‘Color Categories as Fuzzy Sets’. Working Paper No. 4. Berkeley: Language Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California.
Kempton, Willett: 1978, ‘Category Grading and Taxonomic Relations: A Mug is a Sort of a Cup’. American Ethnologist 5, pp. 44–65.
Lakoff, George: 1973, Hedges; A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts:. Journal of Philosophic Logic 2, pp. 458–508.
McGuire, T. W. et al.: 1968, ‘Estimation and Inference for Linear Models in which subsets of the Dependent variable are Constrained’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63, pp. 334–340.
Press, James S.: 1972, ‘Applied multivariate analysis’. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Rosch, Eleanor H.: 1973a, ‘On the Internal Structure of Perceptual and Semantic Categories’, In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. T. M. Moore, (ed.), New York: Academic Press.
Rosch, Eleanor H.: 1973b, ‘Natural Categories’. Cognitive Psychology 4, pp. 328–350.
Smithson, Michael: 1978a, ‘Fuzzy Nominal Scaling: Applications of Fuzzy Subset Theory to Measurement Problems in the Social Sciences’. Paper presented at S.A.A.N.Z. Conference, in Brisbane.
Smithson, Michael: 1978b, ‘Some Analytical Methods for Fuzzy Ethnotaxonomy’. Unpublished.
Taagepera, R. and Ray, J. L.: 1977, ‘A Generalized Index of Concentration’. Research and Methods 5, pp. 367–384.
Zadeh, Lofti: 1965, ‘Fuzzy Sets’. Information and Control 8, pp. 338–353.
Zadeh, Lofti: 1977, ‘Personal Communication’, cited in Kempton, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smithson, M. Models for fuzzy nominal data. Theor Decis 14, 51–74 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135144
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135144