Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Secularity and biblical literalism: confronting the case for epistemological diversity

  • Article
  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stephen Carter argues that biblical literalism is predicated on an epistemological position drastically different than that maintained by mainstream scientists inasmuch as it operates on the basis of a “hermeneutic of inerrancy” with respect to the ideas laid out in the Bible. By relying on considerations offered by Charles Taylor and recent sociological studies, I contend that Carter’s thesis is incorrect. The divide between proponents and opponents of biblical literalism is ethical rather than epistemological. Beyond the philosophical implications of my contention, this displays that deliberative engagement between these parties—which depends on shared epistemological norms—is possible in principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon M. (2010) The politics of truth: A critique of Peircean deliberative democracy. Philosophy & Social Criticism 36(9): 1075–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski J. (1996) Beyond biblical literalism and inerrancy: Conservative protestants and the hermeneutic interpretation of scripture. Sociology of Religion 57(3): 259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell R. (2011) Love wins: A book about heaven, hell, and the fate of every person who ever lived. HarperOne, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron N. M. (1987) Biblical higher criticism and the defense of infallibilism in nineteenth-century Britain. E. Mellen, Lewiston, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter S. L. (1993) The culture of disbelief. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Criswell W. A. (1969) Why I preach that the Bible is literally true. Broadman Press, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilday R. H. Jr. (1982) The doctrine of biblical authority. Convention Press, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper J. T. (1980) Authority: The critical issue for southern baptists. Fleming H. Revell, Old Tappan, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley J. (2011) Broken words: The abuse of science and faith in American politics. Crown Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickholm, E. (4 March 2011). Pastor stirs wrath with his views on old questions. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/05/us/05bell.html

  • Ferrara A. (2009) The separation of religion and politics in a post-secular society. Philosophy & Social Criticism 35(1–2): 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerbach L. (1854) The essence of christianity, trans. Marian Evans. John Chapman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gish D. T. (1979) Evolution? The fossils say no?. Creation-Life, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham L. (1981) Between science and religion. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley A., Hout M. (2006) The truth about conservative Christians: What they think and what they believe. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham K. (2006) The new answers book: Over twenty-five questions on creation/evolution and the Bible. Answers in Genesis, Green Forest, AR

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennell C. (1838) Inquiry concerning the origins of christianity. Smallfield, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge C. (1874) Systematic theology. Scribner, Armstrong, and Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter R. (1963) Anti-intellectualism in American life. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout M., Greeley A., Wilde M. J. (2001) The demographic imperative in religious change in the United States. The American Journal of Sociology 107(2): 468–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout M., Fischer C. S. (2002) Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review 67(2): 165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humes E. (2007) Monkey girl: Evolution, education, religion, and the battles for America’s soul. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane C. (2011) The age of doubt: Tracing the roots of religious uncertainty. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch C. (1965) The new radicalism in America 1889–1963: The intellectual as social type. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, M. (2011). The three fundamentalisms of the American right. Salon.com, 5 July 2011. http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/07/05/lind_three_fundamentalisms/index.html

  • McKim, D. K. (eds) (1986) A guide to contemporary hermeneutics: Major trends in biblical interpretation. William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D. S. (1899) ’The will to believe’ and the duty to doubt. International Journal of Ethics 9(2): 169–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller K. (1999) Finding Darwin’s god: A scientist’s search for common ground between god and evolution. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller K. (2008) Only a theory: Evolution and the battle for America’s soul. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. (eds) (1974) Scientific creationism. Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Morriston W. (2009) Did god command genocide? a challenge to biblical inerrantists. Philosophia Christi 11(1): 7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport J. P. (1989) Life’s ultimate questions. Word Publishing, Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport J. P., Cannon W. (1974) Why Christians fight over the bible. Thomas Nelson, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll M. (1995) The scandal of the evangelical mind. William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero S. (2007) Religious literacy: What every American needs to know—and doesn’t. HaperOne, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero S. (2010) God is not one: The eight rival religions that run the world—and why their differences matter. HarperCollins, new York

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R. D., Campbell D. E. (2010) American grace: How religion divides and unites us. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph’s Way. (September, 2010). The wunderkind returns. The Economist, 18, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1993) Political liberalism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, J. (February, 2002). In the beginning was the word. Gallup Poll, 5. http://poll.gallup.com

  • Sandeen E. R. (1962) The Princeton theology: One source of biblical literalism in American protestantism. Church History 31(3): 307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon W. L. (1891) The ethics of doubt—Cardinal Newman. International Journal of Ethics 1(2): 224–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (1809). The spirit loving kindness of god displayed in the triumph of republicanism in America (no publisher).

  • Stout J. (2004) Democracy and tradition democracy and tradition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss D. F. (1835) The life of Jesus critically examined. Swan Sonnenechevin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Talisse R. B. (2007) A pragmatist philosophy of democracy. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamney J. B. (2002) The resilience of conservative religion: The case of popular, conservative protestant congregations. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (2007) A secular age. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson A. L. (1850) In memoriam. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrey, R. A., Dixon, A. C. (eds) (1994) The fundamentals: A testimony to the truth. Revell, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield B. B. (1948) The inspiration and authority of the Bible. Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson D. C. C. (1976) The great brain robbery: Creation or evolution?. Moody Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir J. (1994) Biblical inerrancy and infallibility: A philosophical analysis. Southwest Philosophy Review 10(2): 129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells D. F. (1993) No place for truth, or whatever happened to evangelical theology?. William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe A. (2003) The transformation of American religion: How we actually live our faith. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English and Philosophy, Drexel University, MacAlister Hall, Room 5044, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Andrew F. Smith

Authors
  1. Andrew F. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew F. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, A.F. Secularity and biblical literalism: confronting the case for epistemological diversity. Int J Philos Relig 71, 205–219 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9332-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9332-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation