Skip to main content
Log in

Does lower-stage ethical reasoning emerge in more familiar contexts?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four real-life dilemma cases collected from Hong Kong managers were included, along with two other cases previously used by Weber (1991), in an instrument designed to assess ethical reasoning capacity. This was completed by 86 part-time post-graduate students, all of whom were managers with at least four years working experience. Respondents' measured ethical reasoning capacity appeared to be at least as high as comparable samples in the U.S.A. The mean ethical reasoning stage varied between cases. Contrary to expectations, the unfamiliarityper se of a case did not affect ethical reasoning which instead tended toward higher measured stages when issues of public hazard or environmental pollution were introduced, and toward lower measured stages where personal or family finances were at stake. Two methodological points were made signalling the need for caution in research of this kind. First, because of reservations about the adequacy of the standard Kohlbergian model of ethical reasoning development, a scoring guide based on a revised Kohlbergian model of ethical reasoning was used to analyze the replies, rendering comparisons with other samples inexact. Second, the possible phenomenon of quasi Stage Five reasoning renders problematic the identification of “true” Stage Five ethical reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum, L. A.: 1988, ‘Gilligan and Kohlberg: Implications for Moral Theory’,Ethics 98, 472–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A. and L. Kohlberg: 1987,The Measurement of Moral Judgement, Volume One: Theoretical Foundations and Research Validations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R.: 1991, ‘Moral Reasoning in Work-Related Conflicts’, in W. C. Frederick and L. E. Preston (eds.),Business Ethics: Research Issues and Empirical Studies (JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., K. Merron and W. R. Torbert: 1987, ‘Human Development and Managerial Effectiveness’,Group and Organization Studies 12(3), 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S. J. M. and J. W. Giebink: 1979, ‘Moral Judgement as a Function of Age, Sex, and Stimulus’,The Journal of Psychology 102, 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1977, ‘In a Different Voice: Women's Conception of the Self and of Morality’,Harvard Educational Review 47, 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982,In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 1987,The Ethics of Management (Irwin, Homewood, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969,Stages in the Development of Moral Thought and Action (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1973, ‘Continuities in Childhood and Adult Moral Development Revisited’, in P. B. Baltes and K. W. Schaie (eds.),Lifespan Developmental Psychology: Personality and Socialisation (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1981,Essays in Moral Development, Volume One: The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1984,Essays in Moral Development, Volume Two: The Psychology of Moral Development (Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1986, ‘A Current Statement on Some Theoretical Issues’, in S. Modgil and C. Modgil (eds.),Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy (The Falmer Press, Lewes).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., C. Levine and A. Hewer: 1983,Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Response to Critics (Karger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, W. Y.: 1985, ‘Kohlberg and Business Ethics’, in P. Werhane and K. D'Andrade (eds.),Profit and Responsibility: Issues in Business and Professional Ethics (Edwin Mellen Press: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1989,Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, R. S.: 1993,Developing Skills for Ethical Management (Chapman & Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’,Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1990, ‘Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas’,Human Relations 43, 687–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1991, ‘Adapting Kohlberg to Enhance the Assessment of Managers' Moral Reasoning’,Business Ethics Quarterly 1(3), 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1993, ‘Exploring the Relationship Between Personal Values and Moral Reasoning’,Human Relations 46(4), 435–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. and S. Green: 1991, ‘Principled Moral Reasoning: Is It a Viable Approach to Promote Ethical Integrity?’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 325–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Robin Snell directs the M.B.A. at the City University of Hong Kong, where he is University Senior Lecturer. He has editedManagement Learning and has published articles inPersonnel Review on experiential learning, moral dilemmas and management development. His book,Developing Skills for Ethical Management, synthesizes these interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snell, R. Does lower-stage ethical reasoning emerge in more familiar contexts?. J Bus Ethics 14, 959–976 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872112

Keywords

Navigation