Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Micro-economic models of problem choice in basic science

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the way in which a certain representation of basic scientific knowledge can be coupled with traditional microeconomic analysis to provide an analysis of “rational” research planning or “agenda setting” in basic science. Research planning is conceived as a resource allocation decision in which resources are being allocated to activities directed towards the solution of “basic scientific problems”. A “structuralist” representation of scientific knowledge is employed to provide a relatively precise characterization of a basic scientific problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balzer, W., C.-U. Moulines and J. D. Sneed: 1987, An Architectonic for Science. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gieryn, Thomas F.: 1978, ‘Problem Retention and Problem Change in Science’, Sociological Inquiry 48, 96–115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hobbs, J. R. and R. C. Moore: 1985, Formal Theories of the Common Sense World. Ablex, Norwood NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krantz, D. L.: 1965, ‘Research Activity in ‘Normal’ and ‘Anomalous’ Areas’, Journal of the Behavioral Sciences 1, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhn, Thomas H.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin, B. R. and J. Irvine: 1981, ‘Internal Criteria for Scientific Choice: An Evaluation of Research in High-Energy Physics Using Electron Accelerators’, Minerva 19, 408–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merton, R. K.: 1957, ‘Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science’, American Sociological Review 22, 635–59.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mulkay, M. J., G. N. Gilbert and S. Woolgar: 1975, ‘Problem Areas and Research Networks in Science’, in Sociology, The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 9, 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sneed, J. D.: 1986, ‘Machine Models of the Growth of Knowledge: Theory Nets in PROLOG' to appear in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: 20 Years After: Proceedings of an International Conference in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Thesaloniki, Greece.

  10. Weinberg, Alvin M.: 1984, ‘Values in Science: Unity as a Criterion of Scientific Choice’, Minerva 22, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein, Deena: 1976, ‘Determinants of Problem Choice in Scientific Research’, Sociological Symposium 16, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zuckerman, H.: 1978, ‘Theory Choice and Problem Choice in Science’, Sociological Inquiry 48, 65–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities, Colorado School of Mines, 80401, Golden, Colorado, USA

    Joseph D. Sneed

Authors
  1. Joseph D. Sneed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The research reported here was partially supported by a grant from the EXXON Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sneed, J.D. Micro-economic models of problem choice in basic science. Erkenntnis 30, 207–224 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184823

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184823

Keywords

Search

Navigation