Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 27, 2022

A rhetoric of inauthenticity: critical object images in Woolf’s Victorian scenes

  • Margaret J.-M. Sönmez ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

This paper extends the fields of visual and object semiosis, style, and rhetoric by introducing the concept of critical object images. It identifies five of their rhetorical functions in literature and demonstrates the semiotic and rhetorical specificity and force of literary object images. Inter-disciplinary concepts and theories used in the study are introduced before the concept is tested and developed through analyses of object images with critical roles in the Victorian scenes of Virginia Woolf’s novels. The inductive analyses trace the semiosis and stylistic affordances (meanings) of the selected critical object images, with reference to three categories of kitsch inauthenticity, and their formal and cultural contexts, noting the rhetorical function(s) they serve. Multimodal stylistics and the semiotics of visual images and of objects are used in these analyses, and the unique contribution of critical object images as rhetorical elements in literature is uncovered and explained. The analysis of Woolf’s representation of selected objects shows how the critical object images function rhetorically, through their stylistic connotations (here of kitsch inauthenticity), to present unambiguous meanings that are not openly stated in the texts’ verbal discourse.


Corresponding author: Margaret J.-M. Sönmez, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, E-mail:

References

Barthes, Roland. 1997. Image-music-text, Stephen Heath (trans.). London: HarperCollins.Search in Google Scholar

Beer, Gillian. 1996. Virginia Woolf: The common ground. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Clive. 1914. Art. New York: Frederick A. Stokes.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Quentin. 1987. Virginia Woolf: A biography. London: Grafton Books.Search in Google Scholar

Boutaud, Jean Jacques. 1994. Visual semiotics, pragmatics, and communication. In Thomas A. Sebeok & Jean Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), Advances in visual semiotics: The semiotic web 1992–1993, 3–19. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110874259.3Search in Google Scholar

Briggs, Julia. 2010. The novels of the 1930s and the impact of history. In Susan Sellers (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Virginia Woolf, 70–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521896948.004Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Bill. 2003. A sense of things: The object matter of American literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226076317.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Bill. 2015. The secret life of things (Virginia Woolf). In Other things, 49–78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226283166.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Julia Prewitt. 2008. The bourgeois interior. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brzyski, Anna. 2013. Art, kitsch, and art history. In Monica Kjellman-Chapin (ed.), Kitsch: History, theory, practice, 1–15. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Search in Google Scholar

Calinescu, Matei. 1987. Five faces of modernity: Modernism, avant garde, decadence, kitsch, postmodernism, 2nd edn. Durham: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Caughie, Pamela L. 1991. Virginia Woolf and postmodernism: Literature in quest and question of itself. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cobley, Paul. 2001. Introduction. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 3–13. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, Peter. 1973. The Victorian treasure house. London: Collins.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 2004. Fakes in arts and crafts. In Roland Posner, Klaus Robering & Thomas A. Sebeok (eds.), Semiotics: A handbook on the sign-theoretic foundations of nature and culture, vol. 4, 3571–3579. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110179620.4.15.3571Search in Google Scholar

Eliot, Thomas Stearns. 1947. Notes towards the definition of culture. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Steve. 2007. Virginia Woolf and the Victorians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511484780Search in Google Scholar

Foss, Sonja K. 2004. Theory of visual rhetoric. In Ken Smith, Sandra Moriarty, Gretchen Barbatsis & Keith Kenney (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 141–152. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Freedgood, Elaine. 2006. The ideas in things. Fugitive meaning in the Victorian novel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226261546.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fry, Roger. 1920. Vision and design. London: Chatto and Windus.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Clement. 1965 [1939]. Avant-garde and kitsch. In Art and culture: Critical essays, 3–21. Boston: Beacon Press.10.1525/9780520340770-005Search in Google Scholar

Hoberman, Ruth. 2005. Aesthetic taste, kitsch, and The Years. Woolf Studies Annual 11. 77–98.Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins, Chris. 1998. Victorian modernity? Writing the great exhibition. In Gary Day (ed.), Varieties of victorianism: The uses of a past, 40–61. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-26742-2_3Search in Google Scholar

Kenney, Keith. 2004. Representation theory. In Kenneth L. Smith, Sandra Moriarty, Keith Kenney & Gretchen Barbatis (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 99–115. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kingstone, Helen & Kate Lister (eds.). 2018. Paraphernalia! Victorian objects. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kjellman-Chapin, Monica. 2013. Introduction. In Kitsch: History, theory, practice, ix–xx. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Search in Google Scholar

Kluger, Ruth. 2003. Kitsch and art: Broch’s essay “das Böse im Wertsystem der Kunst”. In Paul Michael Lützeler (ed.), Hermann Broch, visionary in exile: The 2001 Yale symposium, 13–20. New York: Camden House.Search in Google Scholar

Köksal, Fatma Nazlı & Ümit İnatçı. 2020. Visual rhetoric based on triadic approach: Intellectual knowledge, visual representation and aesthetics as modality. Semiotica 233(1/4). 35–53.10.1515/sem-2018-0075Search in Google Scholar

Koppen, Randi Synnøve. 2009. Virginia Woolf: Fashion and literary modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748638727.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Krampen, Martin. 1994. Semiotics of objects revisited. In Thomas A. Sebeok & Jean Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), Advances in visual semiotics: The semiotic web 1992–1993, 515–534. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110874259.515Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther. 2001. Sociolinguistics and social semiotics. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 66–82. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728Search in Google Scholar

Kulka, Tomas. 2002. Kitsch and art. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kundera, Milan. 1999. The unbearable lightness of being, Michael Henry Heim (trans.). New York: Harper Perennial.Search in Google Scholar

Leaska, Mitchell A. 1977. Introduction. In The Pargiters by Virginia Woolf: The novel-essay portion of The Years, vii–xxiv. New York: New York Public Library and Readex Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Hermione. 1996. Virginia Woolf. London: Chatto and Windus.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 2008. Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

McNeillie, Andrew. 2010. Bloomsbury. In Susan Sellers (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Virginia Woolf, 2nd edn., 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521896948.001Search in Google Scholar

Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 1988. Markedness in English discourse: A semiotic approach. Parma: Edizioni Zara.Search in Google Scholar

Merrell, Floyd. 2001. Charles Sanders Peirce’s concept of the sign. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 28–39. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Monica J. 2010. Odds, ends, and others: Objects and the narration of Woolf’s servant characters. Woolf Studies Annual 16. 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13586841003787209.Search in Google Scholar

Moriarty, Sandra & Gretchen Barbatis. 2004. From an oak to a stand of aspen: Visual communication theory mapped as rhizome analysis. In Kenneth L. Smith, Sandra Moriarty, Keith Kenney & Gretchen Barbatis (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, xi–xxii. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Nørgaard, Nina. 2018. Multimodal stylistics of the novel: More than words. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315145556Search in Google Scholar

Ophir, Ella. 2017. “Writing the history of my own times”: Virginia Woolf and the diary. In Jane de Gay, Tom Breckin & Anne Reus (eds.), Virginia Woolf and heritage, 196–201. Clemson, SC: Clemson University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ps32z5.32Search in Google Scholar

Parker, De Witt H. 1946. Principles of aesthetics, 2nd edn. New York: F. S. Crofts.Search in Google Scholar

Peach, Lynden. 2000. Virginia Woolf. New York: St Martin’s Press.10.1057/978-1-137-15294-7Search in Google Scholar

Purcell, Mark. 2017. The country house library. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quigley, Megan. 2015. Modernist fiction and vagueness: Philosophy, form, and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316105597Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Derek. 2013. Virginia Woolf and the materiality of theory: Sex, animal, life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748676439.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Seshagiri, Urmila. 2004. Orienting Virginia Woolf: Race, aesthetics, and politics in To the Lighthouse. Modern Fiction Studies 50(1). 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2004.0013.Search in Google Scholar

Sonesson, Göran. 1996. An essay concerning images: From rhetoric to semiotics by way of ecological physics. Semiotica 109(1/2). 41–140.Search in Google Scholar

Spiropoulou, Angeliki. 2010. Virginia Woolf, modernity and history: Constellations with Walter Benjamin. Houndmills: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230250444Search in Google Scholar

Stefl, Matin. 2014. “A very remarkable piece of iron”: Towards a theory of material imagination in Virginia Woolf’s “solid objects.” Prague Journal of English Studies 3(1). 19–34.10.2478/pjes-2014-0015Search in Google Scholar

Swanson, Diana L. 2012. Woolf’s shift: Nonhuman nature in Virginia Woolf’s short fiction. Woolf Studies Annual 18. 53–74.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Nicholas. 1998. Foreword. In Alfred Gell (ed.), Art and agency: An anthropological theory, vii–xiii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5594/M00586Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Nigel, J. T. 2019. Mental imagery. In Edward, N. (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/mental-imagery/ (accessed 1 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Transcue, Pamala J. 1986. Virginia Woolf and the politics of style. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Veereshwar, Prakash & Nupur Sharma. 2001. Aesthetics. Meerut: Krishna Prakashan.Search in Google Scholar

Welz, Stefan. 2007a. Introduction. In Elmar Schenkel & Stefan Welz (eds.), Magical objects: Things and beyond, i–vi. Berlin: Galda & Wilch Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Welz, Stefan. 2007b. Virginia Woolf’s solid objects. In Elmar Schenkel & Stefan Welz (eds.), Magical objects: Things and beyond, 145–156. Berlin: Galda & Wilch Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1948 [1941]. The years. London: Pan.10.1002/9781118234266Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1975. The letters of Virginia Woolf: Volume III (1923–1928), Nigel Nicolson & Joanne Trautmann (eds.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1977a. The diary of Virginia Woolf: Volume I (1915–1919), Anne Olivier Bell (ed.). San Diego: Harvest.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1977b. The pargiters: The novel-essay portion of The Years, Mitchell A. Leaska (ed.). New York: New York Public Library.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1977c. [1931]c. The waves. London: Granada.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1977d. [1933]d. Flush: A biography. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1980. The Letters of Virginia Woolf. Volume VI (1936–1941), Nigel Nicolson & Joanne Trautmann (eds.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1982a. The diary of Virginia Woolf: Volume III (1925–1930), Anne Olivier Bell (ed.). London: Harvest.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1982b. The diary of Virginia Woolf: Volume IV (1931–1935), Anne Olivier Bell (ed.). London: Harvest.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1986. The essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume III (1919–1924), Andrew McNeille (ed.). London: Hogarth Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1987. The essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume II (1912–1918), Andrew McNeille (ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1989. The essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume I (1904–1912), Andrew McNeille (ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1992 [1941]. Between the acts. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1994. The essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume IV (1925–1928), Andrew McNeille (ed.). London: Hogarth Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1998 [1928]. Orlando. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Zink, Suzana. 2018. Virginia Woolf’s rooms and the spaces of modernity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-71909-2Search in Google Scholar

Zwerdling, Alex. 1986. Virginia Woolf and the real world. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-07-16
Accepted: 2022-01-22
Published Online: 2022-05-27
Published in Print: 2022-07-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2020-0072/html
Scroll to top button