Leibniz and Ficino: Life, Activity, Matter
Abstract
Although Leibniz characterised himself in the “New Essays” as a “Platonic” as opposed to a “Democritean” philosopher, his intellectual relationship with the most famous of the Renaissance Neoplatonists, Marsilio Ficino, has received little attention. Here we review what can be thus far established regarding Leibniz’s acquaintance with portions of Ficino’s Opera omnia of 1576. We compare Ficino’s disenchantment with the atomistic materialism of Lucretius, which he had favoured in his youth, and his turn to Platonism for inspiration, with Leibniz’s own reported disenchantment with Gassendi’s Epicurean atomism and his invention of a vitalistic monadology that, despite Leibniz’s reservations regarding Ficinian magic, resembles Ficinian nature philosophy in number of striking respects.
Keywords
atomism | causality | Epicureanism | Marsilio Ficino | Lucretius | magic | mechanism | monadology | Neoplatonism | occult philosophy | Plato | Renaissance | vitality | atomisme | causalité | épicurisme | Marsilio Ficino | Lucrèce | magie | mécanisme | monadologie | néoplatonisme | occultisme | Platon | renaissance | vitalité | Atomismus | Kausalität | Epikureismus | Marsilio Ficino | Lukrez | Magie | Mechanismus | Monadologie | Neoplatonismus | Okkultismus | Plato | Renaissance | Vitalität