Skip to main content
Log in

Nozick on Sen: A reply to Perelli-Minetti

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perelli-Minetti argues that Nozick's principle of justice in transfer requires, inter alia, Sen's liberalism condition (L) and is subject to Sen's paradox. It is shown here that a weaker liberalism condition L W is sufficient for justice in transfer and consistent with Sen's other conditions on the social decision function. The conjunction of conditions L W, I P, and N is equivalent to L. It is implausible and perhaps illogical that a society applying Nozick's entitlement theory will impose both I P and N, and if it does not, then Sen's paradox does not affect Nozick's theory of justice in transfer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelli-Minetti, C. R.: 1977, ‘Nozick on Sen: A Misunderstanding’, Theory and Decision 8, 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K.: 1970, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonstegaard, M. Nozick on Sen: A reply to Perelli-Minetti. Theor Decis 22, 203–207 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134084

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134084

Keywords

Navigation