Abstract
Perelli-Minetti argues that Nozick's principle of justice in transfer requires, inter alia, Sen's liberalism condition (L) and is subject to Sen's paradox. It is shown here that a weaker liberalism condition L W is sufficient for justice in transfer and consistent with Sen's other conditions on the social decision function. The conjunction of conditions L W, I P, and N is equivalent to L. It is implausible and perhaps illogical that a society applying Nozick's entitlement theory will impose both I P and N, and if it does not, then Sen's paradox does not affect Nozick's theory of justice in transfer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basic Books, New York.
Perelli-Minetti, C. R.: 1977, ‘Nozick on Sen: A Misunderstanding’, Theory and Decision 8, 387–393.
Sen, A. K.: 1970, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sonstegaard, M. Nozick on Sen: A reply to Perelli-Minetti. Theor Decis 22, 203–207 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134084
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134084