Skip to main content
Log in

Mirror imagery and biological selection

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lake Tanganiyka has lefty and righty cichlid fish that show there can be natural selection for a trait over its mirror image counterpart.This raises the question ‘Can there be biological selection of a whole organism over its mirror image counterpart?’ That is, could the fitness of a fish be altered by simply changing it into its own enantaniomorph? My answer is no. I present Flatlander thought experiment to demonstrate that mirror imagecounterparts are duplicates because they only differ in how they happen to be oriented in space. The counterparts have the same intrinsic properties and are in the same environment,so there can be no difference in fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clifford W.K. 1901. "Conditions of Mental Development”. In: Stephen L. and Pollock F. (eds), Lectures and Essays Vol. I. Macmillan, London, pp. 79–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman J. 1971. "Kant, Incongruous Counterparts, and the Nature of Space and Time” Ratio 1-18. In: van Cleve's J. and Frederick's R. (eds), The Philosophy of Right and Left. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1991, pp. 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington A. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner M. 1990. The Ambidextrous Universe. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach P. 1969. God and the Soul. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori M. 1993. "Frequency dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale eating cichlid fish”. Science 260: 216–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer M. 1969. Concepts of Space. second edn. Harvard University Press.

  • Laland K.N. and Odling-Smee F.J. 2000. “Niche Construction, Ecological Inheritance and Cycles of Contingency”. In: Gray R., Griffiths P. and Oyama S. (eds), Cycles of Contingency. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton R. and Lewis D. 1998. "Defining ‘intrinsic”'. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton A. 1962. "Spaces and Times. Philosophy XXXVII: 130–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J.M. and Szathmary E. 1999. The Origins of Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cleve J. 1987. "Right, Left and the Fourth Dimension” The Philosophical Review 96: 33-68. In: van Cleve's J. and Frederick's R. (eds), The Philosophy of Right and Left. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, Dordrecht, pp. 203–234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sorensen, R. Mirror imagery and biological selection. Biology & Philosophy 17, 409–422 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020160213338

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020160213338

Keywords

Navigation