Skip to main content
Log in

Machine learning, inductive reasoning, and reliability of generalisations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper shows how statistical learning theory and machine learning models can be used to enhance understanding of AI-related epistemological issues regarding inductive reasoning and reliability of generalisations. Towards this aim, the paper proceeds as follows. First, it expounds Price’s dual image of representation in terms of the notions of e-representations and i-representations that constitute subject naturalism. For Price, this is not a strictly anti-representationalist position but rather a dualist one (e- and i-representations). Second, the paper links this debate with machine learning in terms of statistical learning theory becoming more viable epistemological tool when it abandons the perspective of object naturalism. The paper then argues that machine learning grounds a form of knowing that can be understood in terms of e- and i-representation learning. Third, this synthesis shows a way of analysing inductive reasoning in terms of reliability of generalisations stemming from a structure of e- and i-representations. In the age of Artificial Intelligence, connecting Price’s dual view of representation with Deep Learning provides an epistemological way forward and even perhaps an approach to how knowing is possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong DM (1978) A theory of universals: volume 2: universals and scientific realism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlett PL, Mendelson S (2002) Rademacher and gaussian complexities: risk bounds and structural results. J Mach Learn Res 3:463–482

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N (1953) Fact, fiction, and forecast. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman G, Kulkarni S (2007) Reliable reasoning: induction and statistical learning theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Orallo J (2017) The measure of all minds: evaluating natural and artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Orallo J, Dowe DL (2010) Measuring universal intelligence: towards an anytime intelligence test. Artif Intell 174(18):1508–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.006

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DK (1983) New work for a theory of universals. Aust J Philos 61(4):343–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1974) What Is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83(4):435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1986) The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Price H (2011) Naturalism without mirrors. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Price H (2013) Expressivism, pragmatism and representationalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quine WVO (1951) Two dogmas of empiricism. Philos Rev 60(1):20–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Networks 61:85–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea N (2007) Contents and its vehicles in connectionist systems. Mind Lang 22(3):246–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00308.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik VN, Chervonenkis AY (1971) On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory Probab Appl XVI(2):264–280

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA, Pal ChJ (2016) Data mining, practical machine learning tools and techniques, 4th edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Ch, Bengio S, Hardt M, Recht B, Vinyals O (2017) Understanding deep learning requires re-thinking generalization. ICLR 2017 conference version. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.03530v2.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Charles University's research centers program no. UNCE/HUM/037. The Human-Machine Nexus and Its Implications for the International Order and by the grant from VVZ C4SS 52-04 at Metropolitan University Prague. I would like to express my gratitude to both anonymous reviewers and dr. Vit Stritecky for the time they invested in making insightful suggestions greatly improving the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Spelda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spelda, P. Machine learning, inductive reasoning, and reliability of generalisations. AI & Soc 35, 29–37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0860-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0860-6

Keywords

Navigation