Abstract
Those procedures which, at some future date, could constitute the operations resulting in the cloning of a human being are defined as a tool. As humans have been using tools for some two million years, sets of rules or ethics have been devised to make sure that tools are used to promote the maximum benefit and cause the minimum harm. It would, therefore, seem appropriate to consider the human cloning process as one such tool and approach the ethical issues which might govern its use in a manner which has been informed by how we have approached similar instances of new tool development. In this we can be guided by a range of thought experiments and practical considerations. When we combine these two facilities we may conclude that there are some benefits to be gained by the use of the human cloning tool, while there are other aspects of the use of the tool that need to be carefully controlled and regulated. An outline of a pragmatic approach to the initial uses of the tool is described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A.E., McWhir, J., Kind, A.J., Campbell, K.H.S. (1997) Viable offspring derived from and fetal adult mammalian cells; Nature, 385: 810–813.
See also the web site; http://guweb.georgetown.edu/nrcbl/cloning.htm for a 12 page bibliography.
Wakayama, T., Perry, A.C.F., Zuccotti, W., Johnson, K.R., Yanagimachi, R. (1998) Full-term development of mice from enucelated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei, Nature 394: 369–374.
Cloning Human Beings; Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Rockville Maryland, June, 1997.
Hirschberg, P. (1998) Be Fruitful and Multiply, The Jerusalem Report 7#25: 33–36.
Wilkinson, P. (1998) “Prosecution is unable to speculate on motive for alleged attack with a hammer by a hospital chaplain” The Times (London) 14/1/98.
Kevles, D.J. (1986) In the name of eugenics, University of California Press: 426.
Weingart, P. (1989) German Eugenics between Science and Politics; Osiris 5: 260–282.
Smith, A.D. & Zaremba, M. (1997) Outcasts from Nordic super-race, The Observer, 24/8/97: 6.
Beauchamp, T.L. & Childress, J.E. (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics; Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 546.
Devlin, B., Daniels, M., & Roeder, K. (1997) The heritability of IQ; Nature 388: 468–471.
Mayor, F. (1998) Devaluing the human factor; The Times Higher (6 February): 15.
Willadsen, S.M. & Polge, C. (1984) Attempts to produce Monozygotic Quadruplets in Cattle by Blastomere Separation, Veterinary Record 114: 240–243.
Patel, K. (1998) Scientists demand embryo law change; The Times Higher (13 November): 5.
Spier, R. (1998) On deciding who to clone; The Times Higher, February: 15.
Buhl-Mortensen, L. & Welin, S. (1998) The ethics of doing policy relevant science: the precautionary principle and the significance of non-significant results; Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 401–412.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based on a presentation at the 164th Annual Meeting of The American Association for the Advancement of Science (1998). Philadelphia, in the session entitled The Rights and Wrongs of Cloning Humans, February 13, 1998.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spier, R.E. An approach to the ethics of cloning humans via an examination of the ethical issues pertaining to the use of any tool. SCI ENG ETHICS 5, 17–32 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0065-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0065-y