Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Integrated Model of Humanistic Management

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This conceptual paper analyses the arguments which have been made in favour of a transition towards humanistic management. In order to reconcile economic as well as moral arguments an integrative model of humanistic management is presented. This model outlines prospective lines of empirical research especially in the area where business conduct is profitable but not humanistic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arena, C.: 2006, The High-Purpose Company (Harper Collins, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E: (2006) ‘Social Entrepreneurship: It’s for Corporations, Too’, In: A. Nicholls (eds.), Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable social change Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York, 169-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and G. Palazzo: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking’, Academy of Management Review 33(1), 122-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and T. Luckmann: 1966, The social construction of reality (Penguin Books, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birsch, D. and J. H.Fielder: 1994, The Ford Pinto case: a study in applied ethics, business, and technology (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D. and S. Jagadananda: 2007, Civil Society Legitimacy and Accountability: Issues and Challenges (CIVICUS and the Hauser Center, Boston).

  • Chandler, G.: 2002, ‘Let’s Not Fool Each Other with the Business Case’, Ethical Performance 4(1).

  • Choi, J. M., J. W. Murphy and M. J. Caro: 2004, Globalization with a human face (Praeger, Westport, Conn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Currall, S. C. and M. J. Epstein: 2003, ‘The Fragility of Organizational Trust - Lessons from the Rise and Fall of Enron’, Organizational Dynamics 32(2), 193-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. and M. Pirson: 2009, ‘Oikonomia Versus Chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle About the Future Orientation of Business Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 88(3), 417-430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman: 1988. ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, In T. C. Beauchamp, E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 97-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontrodona, J. and A. J. G. Sison: 2006, ‘The Nature of the Firm, Agency Theory and Shareholder Theory: A Critique from Philosophical Anthropology’, Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 33-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic management a stakeholder approach (Pitman, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times 13(September), 32–33.

  • Gioia, D. A.: 2002, ‘Business education’s role in the crisis of corporate confidence’, Academy of Management Executive 16(3), 142-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A.: 2003, ‘Teaching Teachers to Teach Corporate Governance Differently’, Journal of Management & Governance 7(3), 255-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J. P., G. Palazzo and K. Basu: 2007, ‘Investigating Instrumental Corporate Social Responsibility through the Mafia Methphor’, Research Paper Series No. 48-2007, Nottingham University.

  • Goshal, S.: 2003, ‘Business Schools Share the Blame for Enron’, Financial Times 17(July), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshal, S.: 2005, ‘Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices’, Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1), 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1985, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greyser, S. A.: 1982, Johnson & Johnson: The Tylenol Tragedy, HBS Case Study (HBS, Cambridge, MA).

  • Habermas, J.: 1984, Theory of Communicative Action (Beacon Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C. L. and E. R. Stafford: 2006, ‘Chilling with Greenpeace – From the Inside Out’, Stanford Social Innovation Review (Summer), 54–59.

  • Harvey, B.: 1995, ‘Ethical Banking: The Case of the Co-operative Bank’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(12), 1005-1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, H.: 2007, ‘New Strategies for a Sustainable Society: The growing Contribution of Social Entrepreneurship’, Business Ethics Quarterly 17(4), 743-749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, C. O., S. Schmidheiny and P. Watts: 2002, Walking the talk - The business case for sustainable development (Greenleaf, Sheffield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husock, H.: 2006, Muhammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank, HBS Case Study (HBS, Cambridge, MA).

  • John, L.: 1991, ‘Bhopal: An essay on moral responsibility and civic virtue’, Journal of Social Philosophy 22(1), 73-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. and R. Reisen de Pinho: 2007, Natura: Global Beauty Made in Brazil, HBS Case Study (HBS, Cambridge, MA).

  • Kädtler, J. (2001) ‘Social Movements and Interest Groups as Triggers for Organizational Learning’, In: M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, I. Nonaka (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford University Press: New York, 221-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1997, Critique of practical reason, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 2003 [1795], Zum ewigen Frieden ein philosophischer Entwurf, (Reclam, Stuttgart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A.: 2007a, ‘Doing well by doing good - case study: Fair & Lovely™ whitening cream’, Strategic Management Journal 28(13), 1351-1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A.: 2007b, ‘The Mirage of Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid: How the Private Sector can Alleviate Poverty’, California Management Review 49(4), 90-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A.: 2009, ‘Romanticizing the Poor’, Stanford Social Innovation Review 7(1), 38-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, J. and Turner, C.: 2003, ‘The Business Case for Corporate Responsibility’, Arthur D. Little and Business in the Community, Cambridge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letelier, M. F., F. Flores and C. Spinosa: 2003, ‘Developing Productive Customers in Emerging Markets’, California Management Review 45(4), 77-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, S. M.: 2001, ‘Eco-Identity as Discursive Struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria’, The Journal of Business Communication 38(1), 58-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, S. M.: 2002, ‘Global Warming Wars: Rhetorical and Discourse Analytic Approaches to ExxonMobil’s Corporate Public Discourse’, The Journal of Business Communication 39(1), 117-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livesey S. M., K. Kearins (2002) ‘Transparent and Caring Corporations?’ Organization & Environment 15(3), 233-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llano, A., R. Alvira, T. Calleja, M. Bastons and C. Martinez Esteruelas: 1992, El humanismo en la empresa (Rialp, Madrid).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R., S. Warren and M. Hammer: 2008, 2008 Global Accountability Report, London.

  • Luhmann, N.: 1971. ‘Öffentliche Meinung’, in N. Luhmann (eds.), Politische Planung, (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen), pp. 9-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., J. Robinson and K. Hockerts: 2006, Social entrepreneurship (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D. and J. P. Walsh: 2003, ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2), 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L. and S. Osberg: 2007, ‘Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition’, Stanford Social Innovation Review (Spring), 29–39.

  • Mattocks, R.: 2008, Zone of insolvency: how nonprofits avoid hidden liabilities & build financial strength, (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows and J. Randers: 1992, Beyond the limits: global collapse or a sustainable future (Earthscan Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D.: 2003a, ‘The Challenge of Humanistic Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 44(1), 77-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D.: 2003b, ‘Organizational Humanizing Cultures: Do They Generate Social Capital?’ Journal of Business Ethics 45(1/2):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D.: 2008, ‘Integrating Ethics into Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(3), 291-297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D.: 2009, ‘Editorial Introduction: Towards a More Humanistic Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 88(3), 413-416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natura: 2009, ‘Natura Annual Report 2008’, Cajamar.

  • Nicholls, A.: 2006, Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, (Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • N.N.: 2006, Líder de mercado de cosméticos brasileño apunta a internacionalización, El Mercurio, 8(October).

  • Olsen, M. and E. Boxenbaum: 2009, ‘Bottom-of-the-Pyramid: Organizational Barriers to Implementation’, California Management Review 51(4), 100-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M. and F. L. Schmidt: 2003, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis’, Organization Studies 24(3), 403-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. W.: 2004, Earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect (Island Press, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser F (1994) ‘Moral Perspectives on Teaching’, In: F. Darling-Hammond (eds.), Review of Research in Education. American Educational Research Association, Washington, 57-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirson M (2009) ‘Social Entrepreneurship: A Blueprint for Humane Organizations?’ In: H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, von E. Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 248-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porritt, J.: 2003, The World in Context: Beyond the Business Case for Sustainable Development (HRH The Prince of Wale’s Business and The Environment Programme, Cambridge).

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review (December) 80(12), 3–14.

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review 85(12), 78-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and S. Hart: 2002, ‘The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid’, Strategy + Business 26:2-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann, O., A. Ionescu-Somers and U. Steger: 2005, ‘The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options’, European Management Journal 23(1), 27-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, M. and R. Ulmer: 2002, ‘A Post-Crisis Discourse of Renewal: The Cases of Malden Mills and Cole Hardwoods’, Journal of Applied Communication Research 30(2), 126-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, C. and J. Mair: 2005, ‘Social Entrepreneurship: Creating New Business Models to Serve the Poor’, Business Horizons 48(3), 241-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A (2009). Development as Freedom: Individual Freedom as a Social Commitment, In: H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, E. von Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 156-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, P. S.: 1979, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns’, Academy of Management Review 4(1), 63-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G.: 2007, ‘Toward a Common Good Theory of the Firm: The Tasubinsa Case’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(4), 471-480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. G.: 2008, Corporate governance and ethics: an Aristotelian perspective, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H.: 2009a, ‘The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility’, Corporate Governance 9(4), 495-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H.: 2009b, ‘Organizational Moral Learning: What, if anything, do corporations learn from NGO critique?’ Journal of Business Ethics 88(1), 157–173.

  • Spitzeck, H., M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan and E. von Kimakowitz: 2009, Humanism in Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P.: 2008, Integrative Economic Ethics: Foundations of a Civilized Market Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P. (2009) ‘Towards a civilized market economy: economic citizenship rights and responsibilities in service of a humane society’, In: H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, E. von Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 143-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact: 2007, ‘The Principles of Responsible Management Education’, New York.

  • United Nations Department of Public Information: 2006, ‘Criteria. What is an NGO?’ New York).

  • Useem, M.: 1999, The Leadership Moment (Three Rivers Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. J.: 2005, ‘Is There a Market for Virtue? The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review 47(4), 20-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Kimakowitz, E., M. Pirson, H. Spitzeck, C. Dierksmeier and W. Amann: 2010, Humanistic Management in Practice (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S.: 2003, ‘Former Enron vice president Sherron Watkins on the Enron collapse’, Academy of Management Executive 17(4), 119-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E.: 1979, The social psychology of organizing, (Addison-Wesley, Reading).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. and M. Sillanpää: 1997, The stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value (Pitman, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S.: 2004, ‘The Path to Corporate Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review 82(12), 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cranfield School of Management, Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0AL, U.K.

    Heiko Spitzeck

Authors
  1. Heiko Spitzeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heiko Spitzeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spitzeck, H. An Integrated Model of Humanistic Management. J Bus Ethics 99, 51–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0748-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0748-6

Key words

Search

Navigation