Abstract
I may have taken the subject of this volume, “Moral Capacity,” too literally, or too medically, because my concern is with how to determine a patient’s decision making capacity, and how it relates to medical ethics — not moral capacity per se so much as the union set of capacity and morality. I will use two case studies of elderly patients. I will focus on the relation of capacity to philosophical concepts of personhood and, also, the relation of capacity and psychiatry. Both share an underlying theme of the commonsense or “folk” nature of our concepts of capacity and persons, and how distortions can arise from trying to define these concepts in more scientific ways, distortions with serious ethical consequences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Spike, J. (2001) Personhood and a paradox about capacity. In Thomasma, D.C., Weisstub, D.N, Herve, C (eds.), Personhood and Health Care, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands: 243–52.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spike, J. (2004). Capacity is Not in Your Head. In: Thomasma, D.C., Weisstub, D.N. (eds) The Variables of Moral Capacity. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6677-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2552-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive