Abstract
Following an examination of the missions of industry and the university there is a comparison of the ‘wish-lists’ of industry and the university. These ‘wish-lists’ have both similarities and differences. Some of the differences are expressed in a further section on the kinds of interactions that neither institution wants from the other. In the canonical university, the culture values features such as openness, individuality and the de-emphasis of monetary matters, whereas in the archetypal industry the prevailing ethos tends towards secrecy, teamwork and financial advancement. When two such cultures are juxtaposed under conditions where the survival of the university is dependent, in part, on receiving funds from industry, there is a danger of an erosion of academic standards as the university becomes more oriented to service the needs of industry as opposed to the development of its students and its independent scholastic and research activities. Industry, however, is in a position to derive benefit from the interaction without incurring an equivalent cost. These issues are discussed and some recommendations are made to improve the ethical nature of the interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maddox J. (1994) Academics in business mix poorly,Nature 371, 555.
Policy and Strategy for Higher Education: Collaboration between Business and Higher Education (1989), The Department of Trade and Industry and the Council for Industry and Higher Education. HMSO, London, p 8–9.
Editorial (1994) The Dangers of the University Business,Nature 372, 579–580.
Giamatti A.B. (1982) The University, Industry, and Cooperative Research,Science 218, 1278–1280.
Guidelines for Directors. (1990) Institute of Directors, London, U.K., pp 11–12.
Industrial Perspectives on Innovation and Interactions with Universities: Summary of Interviews with Senior Industrial Officials (1991), National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Restructuring Academic Science: A New Framework for UK Policy (1989), John Ziman, Director, Science Policy Support Group. SPSG Concept Paper No.8. 22 Henrietta St., London WC2E 8NA. (2.5.4: 3.6.1).
Information for Table 1 abstracted from G. Messadié (1991)Great Modern Inventions, Chambers, Edinburgh.
Coleman R. (Government Chief Chemist), (1983) Conference Speech at ‘Biotech ’83’, OnLine, Wembly, London.
Abelson P.H., (1994) Editorial: Evolution of Industrial Research,Science 265, 299.
Forward Look of Government-funded Science, Engineering and Technology, Statistical Supplement (1994). HMSO, London, Table 1.5.1.
Powell D., (1994), Report Condemns Pressure to Publish,Science 264, 1162.
Abbott A. (1994) Germany debates future research centres.Nature 372, 4.
US Science OK. (Quoting ISI), (1991),Nature 350, 6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spier, R. Ethical aspects of the university-industry interface. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 151–162 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584071
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584071