Skip to main content
Log in

Forms of trust in education and development

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article an analysis of ‘trust’ is given and two basic forms of trust are distinguished, viz., trust in powers and trust in inclinations. These forms of trust allow us to gain a better understanding in the pivotal role trust plays in the relationship between caretakers, parents and children. It is argued that it makes no sense to speak about basic mistrust of infants, and that having unlimited trust in the inclinations of adults is only a virtue in children. By having trust in both the powers and inclinations of children, parents stimulate the development of their self-confidence and moral identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baier, A.: 1986, ‘Trust and Antitrust’, in Ethics, January 231–260.

  • Baier, A.: 1985, ‘What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?’, in Noûs 19, 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S.: 1978, Lying, Moral Choice in Public and Private Life, The Harvester Press, Hassocks, Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollnow, O.F.: 1965,2 Die Pädagogische Atmosphäre, Heidelberg.

  • Bollnow, O.F.: 1958, Wesen und Wandel der Tugenden, Frankfurt/M.

  • Erikson, E.H.: 1964, Het Kind en de Samenleving, Utrecht,

  • Gambetta, D. (ed.): 1988, Trust, Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D.: 1988, ‘Can We Trust Trust?’, in D. Gambetta (ed.), 213–237.

  • Grossmann, K.: 1988, ‘Entwicklung und Bedeutung von Vertrauen aus der Sicht der Psychologie’, in Pädagogische Welt XLII, 435–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B.: 1984, ‘Moral Judgement, Action and Emotion’, in Philosophy 59, 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V.: 1984, Rights and Goods, Justifying Social Action, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langeveld, M.J.: 1971, Beknopte Theoretische Pedagogiek, Wolters, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1988, ‘Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives’, in D. Gambetta (ed.), 94–109.

  • Luhmann, N.: 1979, Trust and Power, Wiley, Chichester (etc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M.: 1983, Goods and Virtues, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiecker, B.: 1984, ‘The Pedagogical Relationship’, in Oxford Review of Education 10 (2), 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steutel, J.W.: 1984, ‘Deugdzaamheid Als Opvoedingsdoel’, in: J.W. Steutel (ed.), Morele Opvoeding, Boom, Meppel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.: 1988, ‘Formal Structures and Social Reality’, in D. Gambetta (ed.), 3–14.

  • Ijzendoorn, M.H. van: 1988, ‘De Ontwikkeling van Gehechtheid, Determinanten en Effecten’, in W. Koops and J.J. van der Werff (red.), Overzicht van de Ontwikkelingspsychologie, Deel III, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiecker, B. Forms of trust in education and development. Stud Philos Educ 10, 157–164 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372681

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372681

Key Words

Navigation