Analogy and inductive logic : A note on Niiniluoto

Spohn, Wolfgang

Analogy and inductive logic : A note on Niiniluoto

Dateien

Spohn_Analogy.pdfGröße: 640.78 KBDownloads: 284

Datum

1981

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Philosophie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Zusammenfassung

The first part of the note makes some critical remarks on Niniluoto (1981) (in the same issue), arriving at the conclusion that the systems proposed by Niiniluoto fail to satisfy symmetry, positive instantial relevance, and the Reichenbach axiom, and are thus more defective than seems acceptable. As I try to show in the second constructive part, positive instantial relevance and the Reichenbach axiom may be regained for analogical inference. The note closes with some general skeptical remarks to the effect that by trying to accommodate analogy considerations inductive logic regresses to subjectivism.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

100 Philosophie

Zitieren

ISO 690

SPOHN, Wolfgang, 1981. Analogy and inductive logic : A note on Niiniluoto. In: Erkenntnis. 1981, 16(1). ISSN 0165-0106. Available under: doi: 10.1007/BF00219641

BibTex

@article{Spohn1981Analo-13673,
  year={1981},
  doi={10.1007/BF00219641},
  title={Analogy and inductive logic : A note on Niiniluoto},
  number={1},
  volume={16},
  issn={0165-0106},
  journal={Erkenntnis},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/13673">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The first part of the note makes some critical remarks on Niniluoto (1981) (in the same issue), arriving at the conclusion that the systems proposed by Niiniluoto fail to satisfy symmetry, positive instantial relevance, and the Reichenbach axiom, and are thus more defective than seems acceptable. As I try to show in the second constructive part, positive instantial relevance and the Reichenbach axiom may be regained for analogical inference. The note closes with some general skeptical remarks to the effect that by trying to accommodate analogy considerations inductive logic regresses to subjectivism.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>1981</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-27T08:00:20Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Analogy and inductive logic : A note on Niiniluoto</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/13673"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Erkenntnis ; 16 (1981), 1. - pp. 35-52</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13673/2/Spohn_Analogy.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-27T08:00:20Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13673/2/Spohn_Analogy.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein