Mediating actio in distans: Leibniz, Clarke and Newton on the communicability of forces

References

1. Blumenberg, Hans. ( 2009), Geistesgeschichte der Technik, Frankfurt am Main:: Suhrkamp;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boas Hall, Mary, and Hall, Rupert. ( 1959;), ‘ Newton’s electric spirit: Four oddities. ’, Isis, 50:4, pp. 473–76.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cantor, G. N.. ( 1981;), ‘ The theological significance of ethers. ’, in G. N. Cantor, and M. J. S. Hodge. (eds), Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories 1740–1900, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 135–56.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cassirer, Ernst. ( 1998;), ‘ Leibniz System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen. ’, in B. Recki. (ed.), Ernst Cassirer: Gesammelte Werke: Hamburger Ausgabe, vol. 1, Hamburg:: Meiner;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clarke, Samuel. ( [1705] 1998), A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God: And other Writings, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Derrida, Jacques. ( 1967;), ‘ Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. ’, in D. Jacques. (ed.), Writing and Difference, London:: Routledge;, pp. 278–94.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Freudenthal, Gideon. ( 1982), Atom und Individuum im Zeitalter Newtons: Zur Genese der mechanistischen Natur- und Sozialphilosophie, Frankfurt am Main:: Suhrkamp;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Friedman, Michael. ( 1986;), ‘ The metaphysical foundation of Newtonian science. ’, in R. E. Butts. (ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science, London:: Springer;, pp. 25–60.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Friedman, Michael. ( 1990;), ‘ Kant and Newton: Why gravity is essential to matter. ’, in P. Bricker, and R. I. G. Hughes. (eds), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 185–202.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Guillory, John. ( 2010;), ‘ Genesis of the media concept. ’, Critical Inquiry, 36:2, pp. 321–62.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hawes, Joan L.. ( 1968;), ‘ Newton’s revival of the aether hypothesis and the explanation of gravitational attraction. ’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 23:2, pp. 200–12.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Henry, John. ( 2011;), ‘ Gravity and de gravitatione: The development of Newton’s ideas on action at a distance. ’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42:1, pp. 11–27.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hesse, Mary B.. ( 1955;), ‘ Action at a distance in classical physics. ’, Isis, 46:4, pp. 337–53.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hesse, Mary B.. ( 1961), Forces and Fields: The Concept of Action at a Distance in the History of Physics, London:: Nelson;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hoffmann, Stefan. ( 2003), Geschichte des Medienbegriffs, Hamburg:: Meiner;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hörl, Erich. ( 2015;), ‘ The technological condition. ’, Parrhesia, 22, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hörl, Erich. ( 2018), Sacred Channels: The Archaic Illusion of Communication, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Iltis, Carolyn. ( 1973;), ‘ The Leibnizian-Newtonian debates: Natural philosophy and social psychology. ’, British Journal for the History of Science, 6:4, pp. 343–77.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Janiak, Andrew. ( 2013;), ‘ Three concepts of causation in Newton. ’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44:3, pp. 396–407.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kochiras, Hylarie. ( 2011;), ‘ Gravity’s cause and substance counting: Contextualizing the problems. ’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42:1, pp. 167–84.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Koyré, Alexandre, and Cohen, I. Bernard. ( 1961;), ‘ The case of the missing Tamquam: Leibniz, Newton & Clarke. ’, Isis, 52:4, pp. 555–66.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Koyré, Alexandre, and Cohen, I. Bernard. ( 1962;), ‘ Newton & the Leibniz-Clarke-correspondence. ’, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Science, 15:1, pp. 63–126.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Leibniz, Gottfried W.. ( [1710] 1951), Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil (trans. E. M. Huggard.), London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Leibniz, Gottfried W. ( 1962;), ‘ Initia Rerum Mathematicarum Metaphysica. ’, in C. I. Gerhardt. (ed.), Mathematische Schriften, vol. 7, Hildesheim:: Olms;, pp. 17–29.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Leibniz, Gottfried W., and Clarke, Samuel. ( 1717), A Collection of Papers, which Passed between the late Learned Mr. Leibnitz [sic] and Dr. Clarke, in the Years 1715 and 1716, London:: Knapton;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Linhard, Frank. ( 2008), Newtons spirits und der Leibnizsche Raum, Hildesheim:: Olms;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Newton, Isaac. ( [1687] 1934), Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Newton, Isaac. ( [1717] 1952), Opticks: Or, a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light, New York:: Dover;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Newton, Isaac. ( 1978), Isaac Newton’s Papers & Letters on Natural Philosophy, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Peters, John Durham. ( 2000), Speaking into the Air. A History of the Idea of Communication, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Peters, John Durham,, Sprenger, Florian, and Vagt, Christina. ( 2020), Actio in Distans, Lüneburg:: Meson Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Schliesser, Eric. ( 2011;), ‘ Newton’s substance monism, distant action, and the nature of Newton’s empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras “Gravity and Newton’s substance counting problem”. ’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42:1, pp. 160–66.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Spitzer, Leo. ( 1948;), ‘ Milieu and ambiance. ’, in L. Spitzer. (ed.), Essays in Historical Semantics, New York:: Vanni;, pp. 179–316.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vailati, Ezio. ( 1997), Leibniz & Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Wahsner, Renate. ( 1981), Das Aktive und das Passive: Zur erkenntnistheoretischen Begründung der Physik durch den Atomismus, Berlin:: Akademie;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sprenger, Florian. ( 2021;), ‘ Mediating actio in distans: Leibniz, Clarke and Newton on the communicability of forces. ’, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 12:1, pp. 57–74, https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00028_1
    [Google Scholar]