Abstract
Advance directives (ADs) have been hailed for two decades as the best way to safeguard patients’ autonomy when they are totally or partially incompetent. In many national contexts they are written into law and they are mostly associated with end-of-life decisions. Although advocates and critics of ADs exchange relevant empirical and theoretical arguments, the debate is inconclusive. We argue that this is so for good reasons: the ADs’ project is fraught with tensions, and this is the reason why they are both important and deeply problematic. We outline six such tensions, and conclude with some positive suggestions about how to better promote patients’ autonomy in end-of-life decision. We argue that ADs should continue to be an option but they cannot be the panacea that they are expected to be.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this paper, we shall only be concerned with treatment-specific ADs, to the exclusion of more generally conceived living wills and power of attorneys to name healthcare proxies.
The End-of life act, n. 2005-370 of April 22nd, 2005. The revised version of the law has been approved on February 2nd 2016. Article L. 1111-11 deals with advance directives and establishes that they are binding for doctors provided that the patient’s actual medical condition corresponds to what has been described in the ADs. (https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do;jsessionid=BCA0AF498C6201146692DFD582E635BE.tpdila18v_3?idArticle=LEGIARTI000031972302&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&categorieLien=id&dateTexte=).
The main results of our clinical ethics study are reported and discussed in: Fournier et al. (2013). More detailed results are available in: Spranzi and Favereau (2013) (http://www.ethique-clinique.com).
References
Aulisio, M.P. 2014. Advance directives and physician–patient relationship: A surprising metamorphosis. In Advance directives, ed. P. Lack, N. Biller-Andorno, and S. Brauer, 121–132. Rotterdam: Springer.
Berger, J.T. 2008. Surrogate decision making: Reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice. Annals of Internal Medicine 149: 48–53.
Berlin, I. 1969. Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty, 118–162. London: Oxford University Press. P. Lack et al. Advance directives.
Bond, C.J., and K. Lowton. 2011. Geriatricians’ views of advance decisions and their use in clinical care in England: qualitative study. Age and Aging 40: 450–456.
Bonner, S., et al. 2009. Are advance directives legally binding or simply the starting point for discussion on patients’ best interests? British Medical Journal 339: 1230–1234.
Buchanan, A. 1988. Advance directives and the personal identity problem. Philosophy and Public Affairs 17: 277–302.
Buford, C. 2008. Advancing an advance directive debate. Bioethics 22: 423–430.
Cohen, A.B. 2014. Overliving. Hastings Center Report 44: 5.
Doukas, D.J., and L.B. McCullough. 1991. The value history. Journal of Family Practice 32: 145–153.
Doukas, D.J., and J.H. Hardwig. 2003. Using the family covenant in planning end-of-life care: Obligations and promises of patients, families and physicians. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 51: 1155–1158.
Dunley, S., et al. 2012. Advance directives in community patients with heart failure. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 5: 283–289.
Emanuel, L. 2000. How living wills can help doctors and patients talk about dying. British Medical Journal 320: 1618–1619.
Evans, N., et al. 2012. A critical review of advance directives in Germany: Attitudes, use and health care professionals’ compliance. PEC Patient Education and Counseling 87: 277–288.
Fagerlin, A., and C.A. Schneider. 2004. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Center Report 34: 30–42. (at 35).
Fournier, V., et al. 2013. Quelle utilité des directives anticipées pour les médecins? (Are ADs useful for doctors and what for?). Presse Medicale 42: 159–169.
Horn, R. 2014. I don’t need my patients’ opinion to withdraw treatment: Patient preferences at the end-of-life and physician attitudes towards advance directives in England and France. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17: 425–435.
Leibniz, G.W. 1952. Theodicy, ed. A. Farrer (trans: Huggard, E.M.). New Haven: Yale University Press. at § 46.
Levi, H.B., and M.J. Green. 2010. Too soon to give up? Reexamining the value of advance directives. American Journal of Bioethics 10: 3–22.
Nishimura, A., et al. 2007. Patients who complete advance directives and what they prefer. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 82: 1480–1486.
Nolan, T., et al. 2005. When patients lack capacity: The roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 30: 342–353.
Perkins, H. 2007. Controlling death: The false promise of advance directives. Annals of Internal Medicine 147: 51–57.
Quill, T. 2000. Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: Addressing the ‘elephant in the room’. JAMA 284: 2502–2507.
Seymour, J., et al. 2004. Planning for the end of life: The views of older people about advance care statements. Social Science and Medicine 59: 57–68.
Shaw, D. 2012. A direct advance on advance directives. Bioethics 26: 267–274.
Spranzi, M., and E. Favereau. 2013. Les directives anticipées chez les personnes de plus de 75 ans. Paris: AP-HP, Ethique: regards croisés. http://ethique-clinique.com/categorie/publications/brochures/.
Stone, J. 1994. Advance directives, autonomy and unintended death. Bioethics 8: 223–246.
Sulmasy, D., et al. 2007. How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 55: 1981–1988.
Tulsky, J.A. 2005. Beyond advance directives: Importance of communication skills at the end of life. JAMA 294: 359–365.
Wiesing, U., R.J. Jox, et al. 2010. A new law on advance directives in Germany. Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 779–783.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spranzi, M., Fournier, V. The near-failure of advance directives: why they should not be abandoned altogether, but their role radically reconsidered. Med Health Care and Philos 19, 563–568 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9704-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9704-7