Abstract
The problem of the current research is to develop an instrument that accurately measures individuals' adherence or nonadherence to both Protestant Ethic and contemporary work values. The study confirms that the traditional Protestant Ethic work values and the contemporary work values are different and the instrument used to measure the work values that individuals actually support is valid and reliable. Two scales were developed based on Protestant Ethic work values and contemporary work values. A four-point Likert scale was used to indicate the extent of agreement or disagreement with statements written to represent Protestant Ethic and contemporary work values. Face and content validities of the instrument were established by using two panels of experts — one consisted of authorities in the area of work values; the other consisted of editorial critics. Reliability of the instrument was confirmed by the Kuder-Richardson and test-retest methods. Four sets of work values emerged with significant discrimination among them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blood, M. R.: 1969, ‘Work Values and Job Satisfaction’, Journal of Applied Psychology 53, 456–459.
Centers, R.: 1949, The Psychology of Social Class (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey).
De Butts, T. C.: 1984, Letter received from Thomas C. De Butts, Vice President, Labor Relations (retired), Burlington Northern Railroad, March 5.
Dunn, A.: 1979, ‘The Case of the Suspect Salesman’, Harvard Business Review 57, 38.
Hammond, M.: 1954, ‘Occupational Attitude Rating Scales’, Personnel and Guidance Journal 32, 470–474.
Haney, P. H.: 1980, ‘Changing Values — Where Are We Going?’ in P. H. Haney (Ed.), Forum Spring-Summer, 8–9.
Herrick, N., S. Bartholomew, and J. Brandt: 1975, ‘Social Experimentation and the Changing World of Work’, in M. E. Strong (Ed.), Developing the Nation's Work Force (American Vocational Association, Washington).
Mirels, H. L. and J. B. Garrett: 1971, ‘The Protestant Ethic as a Personality Variable’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 36, 40–44.
Super, D. E. and P. L. Overstreet: 1960, The Vocational Maturity of Ninth Grade Boys (Teacher College, Bureau of Publications, New York).
Weber, M.: 1958, The Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism, (T. Parsons, Ed. and Translator) (Charles Scribner's Sons, New York). Originally published in Sozialwissenschaft and Sozialpolitik, 1904–1905.
Weiss, D. J., R. V. Davis, G. W. England, and L. H. Lofquist: 1964, ‘Construct Validation Studies of the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire’, in Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, XVII (The Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis).
Whitla, D. K.: 1968, Handbook of Measurement and Assessment in Behavioral Sciences (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts).
Wollock, S., J. Goodale, J. Wijting, and P. Smith: 1971, ‘Development of the Survey of Work Values’, Journal of Applied Psychology 55, 331–338.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
F. Stanford Wayne is an assistant professor in the Management Department at Northern Illinois University. He teaches, speaks, and consults in the areas of written, oral, and interpersonal communications. He has also published several articles relating to communication and ethics both on an education and business point of view.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stanford Wayne, F. An instrument to measure adherence to the Protestant Ethic and contemporary work values. J Bus Ethics 8, 793–804 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383779
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383779