Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Encoding in a Simple Autogenic System

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How did molecules become signs? First, according to Deacon, there had to be an interpreter, a physical process capable of making use of some property of a molecule that offered a “semiotic affordance.” He proposes the model of an “autogenic virus,” the most primitive conceivable recursively self-maintaining kind of molecular system that could broach the boundary between physico-chemical process and “interpretive competence.” In this comment I work up to the question of how Deacon introduces concepts such as “representation” and “record” into his account, to argue that the autogen can pass on its lineage without a genetic template.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Staten.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

I declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Staten, H. Dynamic Encoding in a Simple Autogenic System. Biosemiotics 14, 583–587 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09465-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09465-5

Keywords

Navigation