Skip to main content
Log in

Kommentar I zum Fall: „Kleinkind nach schwerer Verletzung des Zentralnervensystems: Rehabilitation oder Behandlungsabbruch?“

  • Fall und Kommentare
  • Published:
Ethik in der Medizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Hessenauer M, Romein E, Kluger G, Berweck S, Staudt M (2014) Remission from unresponsive wakefulness in children and adolescents: differences between traumatic versus hypoxic origin. Neuropediatrics. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1390571 (45 – fp066 [abstract])

  2. Von Wild K, Laureys S, Dolce G (2012) Apallisches Syndrom, vegetativer Zustand: Unangemessene Begriffe. Dtsch Arztebl 109(4):A143

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kurz R (2001) Decision making in extreme situations involving children: withholding or withdrawal of life supporting treatment in paediatric care. Statement of the ethics working group of the Confederation of the European Specialists of Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 160:214–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Staudt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Staudt, M., Berweck, S. Kommentar I zum Fall: „Kleinkind nach schwerer Verletzung des Zentralnervensystems: Rehabilitation oder Behandlungsabbruch?“. Ethik Med 28, 59–61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-015-0382-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-015-0382-4

Navigation