Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Gert Biesta’s Review of Childhood and the Philosophy of Education: An Anti-Aristotelian Perspective

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Maran, T. (2006). Where do your borders lie? Reflections on the semiotical ethics of nature. In C. Gersdorf & S. Mayer (Eds.), Beyond wild nature: Transatlantic perspectives on ecocriticism. (in the series ‘nature, culture and literature’). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, A. (2005). Living and learning as semiotic engagement: A new theory of education. Lewiston, NY: Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, A. (2008) Can humanism be an environmentalism? The trumpeter: journal of ecosophy 24/3, 86–95 (published online at http://trumpeter.athabscau.ca).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK

    Andrew Stables

Authors
  1. Andrew Stables
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Stables.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stables, A. Response to Gert Biesta’s Review of Childhood and the Philosophy of Education: An Anti-Aristotelian Perspective . Stud Philos Educ 29, 587–589 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9207-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9207-6

Search

Navigation