Skip to main content
Log in

Technology characteristics, choice architecture, and farmer knowledge: the case of phytase

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phytase is an enzyme that frees the phosphorus bound in feed grains and thus reduces the amount of dicalcium phosphate supplementation required for non-ruminants, reducing phosphorous excretion and thus reducing water pollution. This innovation has been widely adopted by feed companies in the US due to decreased phytase production costs and increased dicalcium phosphate costs. The roles played by phytase characteristics and choice architecture in the widespread use of this win–win technology are examined. A recent survey has also revealed that Midwestern farmers are largely unaware of this technology even though they are using it. One implication is that further research on win–win technologies that will be adopted by industries, rather than being dependent on adoption by individuals, may be beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture (formerly USDA-CSREES) under award number 2005-51130-02356, the Cooperative Research Programs 2011-004, and The Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station. We also thank Marcia Shannon and Ray Massey as well as the two anonymous reviewers, whose comments greatly improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura M. J. McCann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stahlman, M., McCann, L.M.J. Technology characteristics, choice architecture, and farmer knowledge: the case of phytase. Agric Hum Values 29, 371–379 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9346-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9346-6

Keywords

Navigation