Skip to main content
Log in

Whistle-Blowing Among Young Employees: A Life-Course Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 2003 National Business Ethics Survey, conducted by the Ethics Resource Center, found that respondents who were both young and had short organizational tenure were substantially less likely than other respondents to report misconduct that they observed in the workplace to an authority. We propose that the life-course model of deviance can help account for this attenuation of acquiescence in misbehavior. As employees learn to perceive informal prosocial control during their socialization into the workforce, we hypothesize that they will become more willing to blow the whistle on misconduct. Analysis of the 2003 NBES (n = 1,417, with a subset of 314 who observed misconduct) reveals that young and short-tenured employees do perceive less informal prosocial control, and that informal prosocial control does boost whistle-blowing; however, tests for mediation of the relationship between youth and short-tenure and whistle-blowing by informal social control were largely negative, suggesting that other explanations are still needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Agresti A. 2007. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. 1989. Social Cognitive Theory. In: R. Vasta (Ed) Annals of Child Development, Vol. 6. Six Theories of Child Development. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker J. R. 1993. Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 408–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, M. S.: 1988, ‹Employee Dissent: The Choice of Voice Versus Silence,’ Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

  • Brief A. P., Motowidlo S. J. 1986. Prosocial Organizational Behaviors. Academy of Management Review 11(4): 710–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess R. L., Akers R. L. 1966. A Differential Association-Reinforcement Theory of Criminal Behavior. Social Problems 14(2): 128–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield R. D. 1989. Labor Stratification and Violent Crime. Social Forces 68(2): 489–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal, J. and G. Halvorson: 2007, ‹Help me Fight’ vs. ‹Use the Process’, Wall Street Journal, April 24, Online Edition

  • Dozier J. B., Miceli M. P. 1985. Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing: A Prosocial Behavior Perspective. Academy of Management Review 10(4): 823–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin T. M., Baucus M. S. 1998. Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowing Processes. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1281–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell M. E., Cohen L. E. 2005. Desisting from Crime. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines J. 1980. Upward Communication in industry: An Experiment. Human Relations 33: 929–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia D. A., Manz C. C. 1985. Linking Cognition and Behavior: A Script Processing Interpretation of Vicarious Learning. Academy of Management Review 10(3): 527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson M. R., Hirschi T. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger D. B., Miceli M. P., Cohen, D. 1987. Oppositionists and Group Norms: The Reciprocal Influence of Whistle-Blowers and Co-Workers. Journal of Business Ethics 6(7): 527–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi T. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander E. P. 1960. Competence and Conformity in the Acceptance of Influence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 61: 361–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne C. 2001. The enforcement of norms: Group cohesion and meta-norms. Social Psychology Quarterly 64(3): 253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph J. 2003. National Business Ethics Survey. Washington, D.C.: Ethics Resource Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, J.: 2007, ‹At the Pentagon, an ‹Encyclopedia of Ethical Failure’, Wall Street Journal, May 14, A1

  • Keenan J. P. 2000. Blowing the Whistle on Less Serious Forms of Fraud: A Study of Executives and Managers. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 12(4): 199–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasley J. R. 1988. Toward a Control Theory of White-Collar Offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 4(4): 347–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J., Heilmann S. G., Near J. P. 2004. Blowing the Whistle on Sexual Harassment: Test of a Model of Predictors and Outcomes. Human Relations 57(3): 297–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little R. J. A. 1988. A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83(404): 1198–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little R. J. A., Rubin D. B. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann H. B., Whitney D. R. 1947. On the Test of Whether one of two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18: 50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz C. C., Sims H. P. Jr. 1981. Vicarious Learning: The Influence of Modeling on Organizational Behavior. Academy of Management Review 6(1): 105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda R. L., Heimer K. 1987. Race, Family Structure, and Delinquency: A Test of Differential Association and Social Control Theories. American Sociological Review 52(6): 826–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight P. E., McKnight K. M., Sidani S., Figueredo A. J. 2007. Missing Data: A Gentle Introduction. New York: Guilford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus J., Viswesvaran C. 2005. Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics 62: 277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M. P., Near J. P. 1984. The Relationships Among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-Blowing Status: A Discriminant Analysis. Academy of Management Journal 27: 687–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M. P., Near J. P. 1988. Individual and Situational Correlates of Whistle-Blowing. Personnel Psychology 41: 267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M. P., Near J. P., 1992. Blowing the Whistle. New York: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M. P., Near J. P., Schwenk C. R. 1991. Who Blows the Whistle and Why? Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45(1): 113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt T. E. 1993. Adolescence-Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Antisocial Behavior: A Developmental Taxonomy. Psychological Review 100: 674–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt T. E. 1997. Adolescence-Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Offending: A Complementary Pair of Developmental Theories. In: T. P. Thornberry (Ed) Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency. Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol 7. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp 11–54

    Google Scholar 

  • 2003 National Business Ethics Survey Data Set © 2004, Ethics Resource Center. Used with permission of the Ethics Resource Center, 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC. 2006, www.ethics.org

  • Near J. P., Miceli M. P. 1985. Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-Blowing. Journal of Business Ethics 4(1): 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmerlee M. A., Near J. P., Jensen T. C. 1982. Correlates of Whistle-Blowers’ Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation. Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pershing J. L. 2003. To Snitch or Not to Snitch? Applying the Concept of Neutralization Techniques to the Enforcement of Occupational Misconduct. Sociological Perspectives 46(2): 149–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J., Podsakoff N. P. 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild J., Miethe T. D. 1999. Whistle-Blower Disclosures and Management Retaliation: The Battle to Control Information About Organization Corruption. Work and Occupations 26(1): 107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin D. B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson R. J., Laub J. H. 1990. Crime and Deviance over the Life Course: The Salience of Adult Social Bonds. American Sociological Review 55(5): 609–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson R. J., Laub J. H. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer J. L., Olsen M. K. 1998. Multiple Imputation for Multivariate Missing-Data Problems: A Data Analyst’s Perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research 33(4): 545–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims R. L., Keenan J. P. 1998. Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 17: 411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector P. E. 2006. Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend? Organizational Research Methods 9(2): 221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes M. E., Davis C. S., Koch G. G. 2001. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe K. M., Vogus T. J. 2003. Organizing for Resilience. In: K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, R. E. Quinn (Eds) Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, pp 94–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland E. H. 1947. Principles of Criminology (4th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño L. K., Victor B. 1992. Peer Reporting of Unethical Behavior: A Social Context Perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35(1): 38–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen C. 2000. Work as a Turning Point in the Life Course of Criminals: A Duration Model of Age, Employment, and Recidivism. American Sociological Review 65(4): 529–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan D. 1990. Autonomy, Interdependence, and Social Control: NASA and the Space Shuttle Challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 225–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver G. R., Treviño L. K., Cochran P. L. 1999. Corporate Ethics Programs as Control Systems: Influences of Executive Commitment and Environmental Factors. Academy of Management Journal 42: 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E.: 1979, The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd Edition (McGraw-Hill, New York)

  • Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. 1993. Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the support of the Ethics Resource Center Fellows Program, which initiated research on this topic and graciously provided access to the 2003 National Business Ethics Survey dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason M. Stansbury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stansbury, J.M., Victor, B. Whistle-Blowing Among Young Employees: A Life-Course Perspective. J Bus Ethics 85, 281–299 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9770-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9770-8

Keywords

Navigation