Skip to main content

ASPECT KINDS

  • Chapter
RETHINKING EXPLANATION

Part of the book series: BOSTON STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ((BSPS,volume 252))

Abstract

One of the things that distinguish natural kinds from mere anthropocentric kinds is that the former have an explanatory role to play in scientific reasoning, while the latter do not. One might, as Alexander Bird puts it, “randomly collect diverse things and give the collection a name, but one would not expect it to explain anything to say that a certain object belonged to this collection”.81 It is difficult to see what natural laws or explanations involve notions that are dictated by our anthropocentric predilections and easier to see the explanatory significance of kinds that exist as kinds independently of our conventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, D.M. (1997). A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, A. (1998). Philosophy of Science. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, C. L. (1994). Higher and Lower Essential Natures. American Philosophical Quarterly 31(3): 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fales, E. (1990). Causation and Universals. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1993). Working in a New World: The Taxonomic Solution. In P. Horowich (ed.): World Changes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalidi, M. A. (1993). Carving Nature at the Joints. Philosophy of Science 60(1): 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalidi, M. A. (1998). Natural Kinds and Crosscutting Categories. The Journal of Philosophy 95(1): 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (2000). The Road since Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H. (1977). Natural Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28: 199–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, E. R. and Noble, G. A. (1982). Parasitology: The Biology of Animal Parasites, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of ‘Meaning’. In Gunderson (ed.): Language, Mind and Knowledge. University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. (1969). Species, Determinates and Natural Kinds. Noûs 3: 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemach, E. (1976). Putnam’s Theory on the Reference of Substance Terms. The Journal of Philosophy 73(5): 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

STENWALL, R. (2007). ASPECT KINDS. In: PERSSON, J., YLIKOSKI, P. (eds) RETHINKING EXPLANATION. BOSTON STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, vol 252. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5581-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics