Abstract
This paper examines the relationships betweenGoethe's morphology and his ideas on aestheticappraisal. Goethe's science of morphology was toprovide the method for making evident purephenomena [Urphänomene], for makingintuitable the necessary laws behind theperceptible forms and formation of livingnature, through a disciplined perception. Thisemphasis contrasted with contemporary studiesof generation, which focused upon hiddenformative processes. It was his views onaesthetic appraisal that informed theseepistemological precepts of his science. Hisstudy of antique artefacts convinced Goethethat these should be prototypes for all art,since they made perceptible the ideal of art,its archetypes or objective forms. His ambitionwas to eliminate the subjective elements hecontended were leading contemporary art astray.He argued that the techniques he developed forcultivating the perception of the idealexemplars of art could become a model forscience, enabling the intuition of theobjective forms of nature through a similardisciplined and cultivated perception. Thispaper also examines some of the widermotivations for the particular emphases Goethegave to his science and aesthetics, noting asimilar impulse to discipline unruly forces inhis life – in his work as an administrator forthe Weimar court and Jena University, in hisvision of an ideal German culture centred onthe aristocracy, and in his literaryproductions and biographical writings. Finallyit discusses the extent to which those unrulyelements nevertheless remained a potent anddisturbing presence in his understanding ofnature, his art and his life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amrine, F., F. J. Zucke and H. Wheeler, eds. 1987. Goethe and the Sciences. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Barasch, M. 1990. Modern Theories of Art, 1: From Winckelmann to Baudelaire. New York: New York University Press.
Beiser, F. 1992. Enlightenment, Revolution and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790-1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Benjamin, W. 1996a. “The Concept of Critique in German Romanticism.” In Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1, 1913-1926, eds. M. Bullock and M.W. Jennings (trans. by D. Lacherman, H. Eiland and I. Balfour), pp. 116–200. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
―1996b. “Goethe's Elective Affinities.” In Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1, 1913-1926, eds. M. Bullock and M.W. Jennings (trans. by S. Corngold), pp. 297–360. Cambridge, MA: Beknap Press.
Boyle, N. 1991-2000. Goethe: The Poet and the Age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bräuning-Oktavio, H. 1956. “Vom Zwischenkieferknochen zur Idee des typus. Goethe als Naturforscher in den Jahren 1780-1786.” Nova Acta Leopoldina NS 18: 4–144.
Bruford, W. H. 1975. The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation: “Bildung” from Humboldt to Thomas Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burdach, K. F. 1817. Über die Aufgabe der Morphologie. Leipzig: Dyk'scher Buchhandlung.
―1816. Enzyklopädie der Heilwissenschaft. Leipzig.
―1810-1811. Die Literatur der Heilwissenschaft. Gotha: Justus Perthes.
―1810. Die Physiologie. Leipzig: Weidemannischen Buchhandlung.
Cunningham, A. 1988. “Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on the Identity and Invention of Science.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 19: 365–389.
Cunningham, A. and N. Jardine. 1990. “Introduction: The Age of Reflexion.” In Romanticism and the Sciences eds. A. Cunningham and N. Jardine, pp. 1–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dettelbach, M. 1996a. “Global Physics and Empire: Humboldt's Physical Portrait of the Tropics.” In Visions of Empire: Voyages, Botany, and Representations of Nature, eds. D.P. Miller and P.H. Reill, pp. 258–301. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
―1996b. “Humboldtian Science.” In Cultures of Natural History, eds. N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary, pp. 287–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goethe, J. W. von. 1980. Goethe on Art, ed. and trans. J. Gage. London: Scholar Press.
―1962-1967. Goethes Briefe, ed. K. R. Mandelkow. Hamburg: Christian Wegner Verlag.
―1948-1963. Gedankausgabe der Werke, Briefe und Gespräche, ed. E. Bueutler. Zürich: Artemis Verlag.
―1948-1960. Goethes Werke, 14 vols. Hamburg: Christian Wegner Verlag.
―1947- ⋯ Die Schriften zur Naturwissenschaft, herausgeben im Auftrage der Deutschen Akademie der Naturwissenschaft (Leopoldina Ausgabe). Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus.
Hagner, M. 1995. “Zur Physiognomik bei Alexander von Humboldt.” In Geschichte der Physiognomik, eds. M. Schneider and R. Campe. Freiburg.
Hamm, E. 2001. “Unpacking Goethe's Collections: The Public and the Private in Natural-Historical Collecting.” British Journal for the History of Science 34: 275–300.
―1997. “Colections, Publication and Legitimation: Goethe on Science and Autobiography.” Paper presented at History of Science Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, 6-9 November.
Hein, W.-H. 1985.Alexander von Humboldt. Leben und Werk. Frankfurt am Main: Weisbecker Verlag.
Hofmann, W. 1994. “Play and Earnest.” In The Romantic Spirit in German Art, ed. K. Hartley, pp. 19–27. Edinburgh and London: Scottish National Gallery and Hayward Gallery.
Humboldt, A. von. 1902. Views of Nature, or Contemplations on the Sublime Phenomena of Creation with Scientific Illustrations, trans. by E. C. Otté and H. G. Bohn. London: George Bell & Sons.
―1989a. “Ideen zu einer Geographie der Pflanzen, nebst einem Naturgemälde der Tropenländer.” In Schriften zur Geographie der Pflanzen, ed. H. Beck. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Jackson, M. W. 1994. “Natural and Artificial Budgets: Accounting for Goethe's Economy of Nature.” Science in Context 7(3): 409–431.
Jahn, I. 1994. “On the Origin of Romantic Biology and its Further Development at the University of Jena between 1790 and 1850.” In Romanticism in Science: Science in Europe, 1790-1840, eds. S. Poggi and M. Bossi, pp. 75–89. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Jardine, N. 2000. Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Koerner, L. 1993. “Goethe's Botany: Lessons of a Feminine Science.” Isis 84: 470–495.
König, G. 1984, “Naturwissenschaft.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, unter Mitwirkung von mehr als 700 Fachgelehrten in Verbindung mit Günther Bien ⋯ [et al.], ed. J. Ritter, vol. 6, pp. 641–650. Basel: Schwabe, 1971.
Lange, V. 1992. The Classical Age of German Literature, 1740-1815. London: Edward Arnold.
Lenoir, T. 1987. “The Eternal Laws of Form: Morphotypes and the Conditions of Existence in Goethe's Biological Thought.” In Goethe and the Sciences, eds. F. Amrine, F. J. Zucker and H. Wheeler, pp. 17–28. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Lichtenstern, C. 1990. Die Wirkungsgeschichte der Metamorphoselehre Goethes von Philipp Otto Runge bis Joseph Beuys. Weinheim: VCH, Acta Humaniora.
Mandelkow, K. R. 1980. Goethe in Deutschland. Rezeptionsgeschichte eines Klassikers, 4 vols. Munich: C.H. Beck.
Mayer, H. 1973. Goethe. Ein Versuche über den Erfolg. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Moritz, C. P. 1962. “Über die bildenen Nachahmung des Schönen.” Schriften zur Ästhetik und Poetik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 63–93.
Nyhart, L. K. 1995. Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800-1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Potts, A. 1994. Flesh and the Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History. London: Yale University Press.
Reed, T. J. 1980. The Classical Centre: Goethe and Weimar, 1775-1832. London: Croom Helm.
Seamon, D. and A. Zajonic, eds. 1998. Goethe's Way of Science: A Phenomenology of Nature. New York: SUNY.
Schelling, F. W. J. 1856-1861. Sämmtliche Werke. Stuttgart: J.G. Gotta'scher Verlag.
Schiller, J. C. F. 1962. Schillers Werke, ed. J. Petersen.Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.
―1967. On the Aesthetic Education of Man, trans. by E. M. Wilkinson and L. A. Willoughby. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
―1965-1967. Sämmtliche Werke, eds. G. Fricke and H. Göpfert. Munich: Hanser.
Sepper, D. Z. 1988. Goethe Contra Newton: Polemics and the Project for a New Science of Colour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steigerwald, J. 2000. “The Cultural Enframing of Nature: Environmental Histories in the German Romantic Period.” Environment and History 6: 451–496.
Swales, M. 1978. The German Bildungsroman from Wieland to Hesse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Todorov, T. 1977. Theories of the Symbol, trans. by C. Porter. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Uschmann, G. 1959. Geschichte der Zoologie und der zoologischen Anstalten in Jena 1779-1919. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Wilkinson, C. M. and L. A. Willoughby. 1962. Goethe as Poet and Thinker. London: Edward Arnold.
Ziolkowski, T. 1990. German Romanticism and its Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steigerwald, J. Goethe's Morphology: Urphänomene and Aesthetic Appraisal. Journal of the History of Biology 35, 291–328 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016028812658
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016028812658