Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relevant deontic logic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Castañeda, H. N. (1981). The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic, in: R.Hilpinen (ed.): New Studies in Deontic Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleave, J. P. (1973/74). An Account of Entailment Based on Classical Semantics, in: Analysis 34, pp. 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. (1972). A Modification of Parry's Analytic Implication, in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13, pp. 117–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, S. (1979). On Logical Validity and Informal Appropriateness, in: Philosophy 54, pp. 377–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, W. T. (1993). Ein Axiomensystem für eine Art von Implikation (analytische Implikation), in Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums 4, Leipzig/Berlin, pp. 5–6. Reprinted in: K. Berka/L. Kreiser (eds.): Logik-Texte. 3rd ed., Berlin 1983, pp. 163–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (1941). Imperatives and Logic, in: Theoria 7, pp. 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre-McCord, G. (1986). Deontic Logic and the Priority of Moral Theory, In: Noûs 20, pp. 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. (1989). The Is-Ought-Problem. Investigations in Alethic-Deontic Systems of Modal Predicate Logic, Salzburg.

  • Schurz, G. and Weingartner, P. (1987). Verisimilitude Defined by Relevant Consequence-Elements, in: T. A. F.Kuipers (ed.), What is Closer to the Truth, Rodopi, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinowjew, A. A. and Wessel, H. (1976). Logische Sprachregeln, Verlag der Wissenchaften, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. (1988). Remarks on the Consequence-Class of Theories, in: E.Scheibe (ed.): The Role of Experience in Science, De Gruyter, Berlin/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. and Schurz, G. (1986). Paradoxes Solved by Simple Relevance Criteria, in: Logique et Analyse 29, pp. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, H. (1979). Ein System der strikten Folgebeziehung, in: Begriffsschrift. Jenaer Frege-Konferenz, pp. 505–518.

  • Wessel, H. (1983). Logik, Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinovjev, A. A. (1973). Complex Logic, D. Reidel, Boston/Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Philosophie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, UHH 21. OG, 6900, Jena, Germany

    Werner Stelzner

Authors
  1. Werner Stelzner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stelzner, W. Relevant deontic logic. J Philos Logic 21, 193–216 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248639

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248639

Search

Navigation