Abstract
Some recent scholarship concerning Alexis de Tocqueville has sought to emphasize aspects of his work that have not previously been seen as central to his ideas. This review essay examines the argument by Swedberg that Tocqueville’s writings on economics are a missing and important theme of his analysis, and those in Locke and Botting’s book that claim he also made significant contributions to feminism. These unorthodox views are explored against the assessments found in Hugh Brogan’s latest biography of the nineteenth century, social and political theorist.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this essay, the three main texts are referenced by the first initial of the author(s)’s surname: B: = Brogan; S: = Swedberg; L & B: = Locke and Botting.
References
Brogan, H. (1973). Tocqueville. London: Collins/Fontana.
Diggins, J. (1978). The bard of savagery: Thorstein Veblen and modern social theory. New York: The Seabury.
Furet, F. (1981). Interpreting the French revolution. [trans. Elborg Forster] Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hess, A. (2009). Gustave de Beaumont: Tocqueville’s darker shadow? Journal of Classical Sociology, 9(1), 67–78.
Jardin, A. (1988). Tocqueville: A biography. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
Lively, J. (1962). The social and political thought of Alexis de Tocqueville. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Pierson, G. (1938). Tocqueville and Beaumont in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sapiro, G. (1992). A vindication of political virtue: The political theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stone, J., Hou, X. Alexis de Tocqueville in the twenty-first century: plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose?. Theor Soc 39, 109–118 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-009-9099-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-009-9099-z