Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New Modus Operandi for the Agricultural Economics Profession

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural economics has, until the 1990s, enjoyeda reputation for relevance and usefulness to theagri-food industry and policy-makers. Thatreputation has been jeopardized by a growinginfatuation with models and quantification, and aconcomitant underemphasis placed on many complexproblems and issues of society. An illustrativeexample is explored, using agriculturalactivity-related damage to the natural resourcebase, environment and ecology. Agriculturaleconomists are urged to respond by broadening theirterms of reference and joining forces with otherdisciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arcus, P.L., "Whither Agricultural Economics: A Look Ahead to the Twenty First Century," Rev. Mktg. And Agric. Econ.62(3) (1994), 415–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, L.M., "Agricultural Economics at the Crossroads: A View from Outside," Cdn. J. Agric. Econ.40(3) (1992), 347–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baffoe, J.K., D.P. Stonehouse and B.D. Kay, "A Methodology for Farm-Level Economic Analysis of Land Degradation Effects Under Alternative Crop Rotational Systems in Ontario," Cdn. J. Agric. Econ.35(1) (1987), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie, S.S., "Sustainable Development: Challenges to the Profession of Agricultural Economists," Am. J. Agr. Econ.71(5) (1989), 1083–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breimyer, H., "Scientific Principle and Practice in Agricultural Economics: A Historical Review," Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73 (1991), 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.W., "Technology, Technical Change and Public Policy: The Need for Collective Decisions," ChoicesQ2 (1991), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering, O., "Fig Leaves for Naked Economists," ChoicesQ3 (1990), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisgruber, L.M., "Sustainable Development, Ethics and the Endangered Species Act," ChoicesQ3 (1993), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, K.R., "Public Policy, the Public Interest and Agricultural Economics," Am. J. Agric. Econ.58 (1976), 785–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, D.D., "Problems and Challenges in Reforming International Agricultural Economics," Cdn. J. Agric. Econ.41(4) (1993), 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, I., "Retooling the Mainstream," Am. J. Agric. Econ.66 (1984), 793–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurnik, J.F., "PoultryWelfare," in P. Hunton (ed.) Poultry Production, Chapter 23 (Amsterdam, Lausanne, New York, Oxford, Shannon and Tokyo: Elsevier, 1995), pp. 561–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, B.D. and D.P. Stonehouse, "The Growth of IntensiveAgriculture in Ontario. University of Guelph," Notes on AgricultureXIX(2) (1984), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K.K. and W.A. Kerr, "The Crow Rate Issue: A Retrospective on the Contributions of the Agricultural Economics Profession in Canada," Cdn. J. Agric. Econ.44(1) (1996), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libby, L.W., "Conflict on the Commons: Natural Resource Entitlements, the Public Interest, and Agricultural Economics," Am. J. Agric. Econ.76(5) (1994), 997–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M.H., P.H. Groenevelt and D.P. Stonehouse, "Stewardship of Soil and Water in the Food Production System. University of Guelph," Notes on AgricultureXXII(1) (1988), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R., D. Thompson and L. Chalmers, "Agriculture in the Australian Economy: A Perspective and Prognosis," The Australian Institute of Agricultural Science National Conference Proceedings(1993), 82–92.

  • Schuh, G.E., "Revitalizing Land Grant Universities: It’s Time to Regain Relevance," Choices Q2 (1986), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse, D.P., "The Economics of Tillage for Large-Scale Mechanized Farms," Soil & Tillage Res.20 (1991), 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse, D.P., "Profitability of Soil and Water Conservation in Canada: A Review," J. Soil & Water Conserv.50(2) (1995), 226–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse, D.P., "A Targeted Policy Approach to Inducing Improved Rates of Conservation Compliance in Agriculture," Cdn. J. Agr. Econ.44(2) (1996), 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse, D.P. and M.J. Bohl, "Selected Government Policies for Encouraging Soil Conservation on Ontario Cash-Cropping Farms," J. Soil & Water Conserv.48(4) (1993), 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse, D.P., B.D. Kay, J.K. Baffoe and D.L. Johnston-Drury, "Economic Choices of Crop Sequences on Cash-Cropping Farms with Alternative Crop Yield Trends," J. Soil & Water Conserv.43(2) (1988), 266–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse, D.P., C. Giraldez and W. van Vuuren, "Holistic Approaches to Natural Resource Management and Environmental Care," J. Soil & Water Conserv.52(1) (1997), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeman, T.S., "Agricultural and Resource Economics: Challenges for the 21st Century," Cdn. J. Agric. Econ. 43(4) (1995), 519–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zantinge, A.W., D.P. Stonehouse and J.W. Ketcheson, "Resource Requirements, Yields and Profits for Monocultural Corn with Alternative Tillage Systems." Soil & Tillage Res.8 (1986), 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stonehouse, D.P. A New Modus Operandi for the Agricultural Economics Profession. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10, 55–67 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007719117580

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007719117580

Navigation