Skip to main content

Informierte Einwilligung und relationale Konzepte von Autonomie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medizinethik

Part of the book series: Grundlagentexte zur Angewandten Ethik ((GAE))

Zusammenfassung

Natalie Stoljar ist eine australische Philosophin und Professorin für feministische, politische und Rechtsphilosophie an der McGill University in Montreal, Kanada. Neben der Forschung zur Rechtsphilosophie widmete sich Stoljar den Schnittstellen von Sozialphilosophie, politischer Philosophie und Moralpsychologie. In diesem Kontext verortet sie auch das Konzept der Autonomie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Barclay, L. (2000): Autonomy and the social self. In: C. Mackenzie/N. Stoljar (Hrsg.): Relational autonomy: Feminist essays on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press, S. 52 – 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. (1991): Autonomy and oppressive socialization. Social Theory and Practice 17, S. 385 – 408.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1994): Free agency and self-worth. Journal of Philosophy 91, S. 650 – 668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudd, A. E. (2006): Analyzing oppression. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O. (1993): Identity and strong and weak evaluation. In: O. Flanagan/A. O. Rorty (Hrsg.): Identity, character and morality. Essays in moral psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press, S. 37 – 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2003): Autonomy, gender, politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C. (2008): Relational autonomy, normative authority and perfectionism. Journal of Social Philosophy 39, S. 512 – 533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C./Stoljar, N. (Hrsg.): (2000): Relational autonomy. Feminist essays on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, C. (2002): Self-trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, C./Sherwin, S. (2000): Relational autonomy, self-trust and health care for patients who are oppressed. In: C. Mackenzie/N. Stoljar (Hrsg.): Relational autonomy: Feminist essays on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press, S. 259 – 279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, D. T. (1987): Personal autonomy and the paradox of feminine socialization. Journal of Philosophy 84, S. 619 – 628.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989): Self, society and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshana, M. (2005): Autonomy and self-identity. In: J. Christman/Anderson, J. (Hrsg.): Autonomy and the challenges of liberalism: New essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 77 – 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2006): Personal autonomy in society. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007): Autonomy and authenticity. Social Theory and Practice 33, S. 411 – 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985a): Human agency and language: Philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (teilweise auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Negative Freiheit ?).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1985b): Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (teilweise auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Negative Freiheit ?).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989): Sources of the self. The making of modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Quellen des Selbst).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1994): The politics of recognition. In: A. Guttman (Hrsg.): Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, S. 25 – 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. S. (2004): Autonomy and informed consent: A much misunderstood relationship. The Journal of Value Inquiry 38, S. 383 – 391.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stoljar, N. (2021). Informierte Einwilligung und relationale Konzepte von Autonomie. In: Biller-Andorno, N., Monteverde, S., Krones, T., Eichinger, T. (eds) Medizinethik. Grundlagentexte zur Angewandten Ethik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27695-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27696-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics