Abstract
For several decades, business has operated according to the tenets of neoclassical economic theory, where the primary obligation of corporations is to maximize profit for shareholders. However, the larger social mandate for business has changed, represented by the rise of language such as "sustainable development", "corporate social responsibility" (CSR) and "stakeholder groups." Nevertheless, the theoretical shift implied by the use of such language has not occurred. Issues of sustainable development and CSR continue to be justified in the terms of neoclassical economic theory through the rationalization of "doing well by doing good".
Within this economic paradigm, CSR cannot move beyond enlightened self-interest (acting in socially responsible ways in order to further one's own ends) because all behavior must be justified economically. This implies that corporate socially responsible behavior will simply cease when it becomes uneconomic, regardless of the impact on interrelated systems which in turn will re-impact the business realm.
Faced with bitter realities arising from complex interactions among social, political, cultural, eco-nomic and natural environments, we may better comprehend and negotiate these problems by moving out of a neoclassical economic justification of the stakeholder model of the corporation to an inter-systems model, shifting from a narrow comprehension of a single economic independent system analyzed apart from its larger context to a fuller understanding of business as one of a number of interrelated systems.
Operational differences between the old and new mandates are described, and two ways to practically shift towards the new mandate are identified as a modified version of scenario planning and the introduction of the voice of the critic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendt, H.: 1958, The Human Condition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
Beauchamp T. and N. Bowie: 1993, Ethical Theory and Business, Fourth Edition (Prentice Hall, New Jersey) (featuring W. Evan and R. Freeman, A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism).
Bell, D.: 1973, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (Basic Books, New York, NY), p. 12.
Boatright, J.: 1994, 'Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation: Or, What's So Special about Shareholders?', Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 393–407.
Brown, D. L. and D. H. Brown: 1999, 'When Leaders Serve: Engaging the Board in Corporate Social Responsibility', Conference Board of Canada.
Clarkson, M.: 1995, 'A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92–117.
De George, R.: 1995, Business Ethics, Fourth Edition (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).
Drobis, D.: 2000, 'Public Relations: Priorities in the Real Economy', Vital Speeches of the Day 67(1), 15–18.
Frederick, W.: 1998, 'Creatures, Corporations, Communities, Chaos, Complexity', Business and Society 37(4), 358–389.
Friedman, T.: 1999, The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization (Farrar Straus Giroux, New York, NY), p. 21.
Homer-Dixon, T.: 2000, The Ingenuity Gap (Alfred A. Knopf, Toronto, ON), p. 46.
Hosmer, L.: 1996, The Ethics of Management, Third Edition (Irwin).
Iyer, G.: 2001, 'International Exchanges as the Basis for Conceptualizing Ethics in International Business', Journal of Business Ethics 31(1), 3–24.
Kok, P., T. Vanderwiele, R. McKenna and A. Brown: 2001, 'A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit within a Quality Management Framework', Journal of Business Ethics 31(4), 285–297. (Cited Shell: 1998, Profits and Principles: Does There Have to be a Choice?, Shell Report.)
McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2001, 'Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective', The Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117–127.
Mitnick, B.: 2000, 'Commitment, Revelation, and the Testaments of Belief: The Metrics of Measurement of Corporate Social Performance', Business and Society 39(4), 419–465.
Payne, D. and C. Raiborn: 2001, 'Sustainable Development: The Ethics Support the Economics', Journal of Business Ethics 32(2), 157–168.
Pruzan, P.: 2001, 'The Question of Organizational Consciousness: Can Organizations have Values, Virtues and Visions?', Journal of Business Ethics 29(3), 271–284.
Ralston Saul, J.: 1995, The Unconscious Civilization (House of Anasi Press, Toronto, ON).
Rowley, T. and S. Berman: 2000, 'A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance', Business and Society 39(4), 397–418.
Savage, G., T. Nix, C. Whitehead and J. Blair: 1991, 'Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders', Academy of Management Executive 5(2), 65.
Schumacher, E.: 1973, Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered (Harper & Row, New York, NY).
Sen, Sankar and C. B. Battacharya: 2001, 'Does Doing Good always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility', Journal of Marketing Research 38(2), 225–243.
Shoemaker, P.: 1995, 'Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking', Sloan Management Review 36(2), 25–40.
Soutello-Alves, L. E.: 2001, 'View from the South', Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, The OECD Observer, 225, 35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stormer, F. Making the Shift: Moving from "Ethics Pays" to an Inter-Systems Model of Business. Journal of Business Ethics 44, 279–289 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023600820194
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023600820194