Skip to main content
  • 1146 Accesses

Abstract

A certain conception of epistemology is often seen, by historians of philosophy, as definitive of the modern period in philosophy. This conception structures the epistemological task by a contrast between our privileged or certain knowledge of our own minds and our problematic knowledge of the external world. With this contrast in mind, our knowledge of the external world seems either impossible or inadequate. Even epistemologies which try to take our knowledge of our minds as a foundation for knowledge of the world fail to bestow upon the latter the certainties of the former, because the bridging principles are tentative or probabilistic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, W.: 1976, `Self-Warrant: A Neglected Form of Privileged Access’, American Philosophical Quarterly 13, 257–72, reprinted in Alston (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, W: 1989, Epistemic Justification, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D: 1963, `Is Introspective Knowledge Incorrigible?’, The Philosophical Review 72, 417–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, P.: 1989, `Content and Self-Knowledge’, Philosophical Topics 17, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, P.: 1997, `What the Externalist Knows A Priori’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, B.: 1999, Perception and Reason, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J 2000‘Reliabilism, Knowledge, and Mental Content’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society100

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, A.: 1990, `Scepticism about Knowledge of Content’, Mind 99, 447–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1988, `Individualism and Self-Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 85, 649–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T 1996`Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge’ Proceedings of the AristotelianSociety9691–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1963, `Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, Journal of Philosophy 60, 685–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1984`First Person Authority’ Dialectica 38 101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1987, `Knowing One’s Own Mind’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60, 441–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1991, `Three Varieties of Knowledge’, Philosophy 30, 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.: 1998, `Externalism, Architecturalism, and Epistemic Warrant’, in C. Wright, B. Smith and C. Macdonald (eds.), Knowing Our Own Minds, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1978, Brainstorms, Bradford Books, Cambridge, Ma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R.: 1637, Discourse on the Method, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol.1, trans. Cottingham, Stoothof and Murdoch, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R.: 1641, Meditations on First Philosophy, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol.2, trans. Cottingham, Stoothof and Murdoch, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A.: 1993, `How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality’, Brain and Behavioural Sciences 16, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P.: 1990, `Privacy’, in Wittgenstein Meaning and MindPart 1, Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J 1994`Moore’s Paradox; A Wittgensteinian Approach’ Mind 103 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, W.: 1986, The Disappearance of Introspection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1986, `Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space’, in J. McDowell and P. Pettit (eds.), Subject, Thought and Context, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1977, `Conscious Belief, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77, 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C.: 1996, `Entitlement, Self-Knowledge, and Conceptual Redeployment’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96, 117–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H 1975, `The Meaning of “Meaning”`, in his Mind, Language and Reality (Philosophical Papers Volume 2),Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T.: 1785, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, A. Woozley (ed.), Macmillan, London, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W.: 1956, `Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1, 253–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S.: 1996, `Moore’s Paradox and Self-Knowledge’, in The First-Person Perspective and Other Essays, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smullyan, R 1981, `An Epistemological Nightmare’, in D. Hofstadter and D. Dennett (eds.), The Mind’s I,Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoneham, T.: 1998, `On Believing that I am Thinking’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoneham, T 1999`Boghossian on Empty Natural Kind Concepts’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society99 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, R 1998`Descartes’ Hidden Argument for The Existence of God’ British Journal of Philosophy 6 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. and B. McLaughlin: 1999, `Is Content Externalism Compatible with Privileged Access?’, Philosophical Review 107 349–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B 1978, Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry,Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T.: 1996, `Cognitive Homelessness’, Journal of Philosophy 93, 554–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1958a, The Blue and the Brown Books, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1958b, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield, A. (ed.): 1982, Thought and Object, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1989a, Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy of Mind: Sensation, Privacy and Intention’, Journal of Philosophy, 86, 622–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1989b, Wittgenstein’s Rule-following Considerations and the Central Project of Theoretical Linguistics’, in A.George (ed.), Reflections on Chomsky, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoneham, T. (2004). Self-Knowledge. In: Niiniluoto, I., Sintonen, M., Woleński, J. (eds) Handbook of Epistemology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-6969-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1986-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics