Abstract
I argue that it is in the philosophers’ best interest to rule Kallipolis because that life is the best available to them. Although the life of pure contemplation of the Forms would make them happiest, I make the case that, on Plato’s view, this life is not an option for them because of the essential psychological connections that he posits between the individual and the city. To make this argument, I first draw on Plato’s city/soul analogy to explore why it is in reason’s best interest to rule the soul. The answer, I claim, rests in the interconnectedness of the three parts of the soul. If reason does not rule the soul, Plato says that reason will be ruled by another part of the soul and will be forced to serve the ends of the ruling part, which is worse for reason than ruling the soul. Similarly, the philosophers must rule or be ruled. I argue that, as we would expect from the city/soul analogy, Plato thinks that it is worse for the philosophers to be ruled by another part of the city than to rule Kallipolis. This is because, on Plato’s view, individuals internalize their culture, and if the philosophers do not rule, they internalize an unjust culture, which adversely impacts their ability to contemplate the Forms. However, if the philosophers rule Kallipolis, they internalize a just society, which best facilitates their contemplating the Forms. The upshot is that, due to the interconnections that Plato sees between psyche and city, he thinks that ruling Kallipolis is the best option available to the philosophers.
Acknowledgements
I am especially grateful to Samuel Baker for very helpful comments and discussions on multiple drafts of this paper. I also thank Dana Miller, Alexander Nehamas, and an anonymous referee for Apeiron for valuable comments on previous drafts.
References
Annas, J. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Aronson, S. H. 1972. “The Happy Philosopher – A Counterexample to Plato’s Proof.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 10(4):383–398.10.1353/hph.2008.1718Search in Google Scholar
Baker, S. 2015. “The Concept of Ergon: Towards an Achievement Interpretation of Aristotle’s ‘Function Argument’.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48:227–266.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735540.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Brown, E. 2000. “Justice and Compulsion for Plato’s Philosopher-Rulers.” Ancient Philosophy 20(1):1–17.10.5840/ancientphil200020111Search in Google Scholar
Buckels, C. 2013. “Compulsion to Rule in Plato’s Republic.” Apeiron 46 (1):63–83.10.1515/apeiron-2012-0013Search in Google Scholar
Cross, R. C., and A. D. Woozley. 1964. Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary. New York: St. Martin’s Press.10.1007/978-1-349-02851-1Search in Google Scholar
Davies, J. 1968. “A Note on the Philosopher’s Descent Into the Cave.” Philologus 112:121–126.10.1524/phil.1968.112.12.121Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1995. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195086457.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lear, J., ed. 1998. “Inside and outside the Republic.” In Open Minded: Working out the Logic of the Soul, 219–246. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Original work published in 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Mahoney, T. A. 1992. “Do Plato’s Philosopher-Rulers Sacrifice Self-Interest to Justice?” Phronesis 37(3):265–282.10.1163/156852892321052524Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1988. Philosopher-Kings. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (trans.) 2004. Plato: Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2007. “Goat-Stags, Philosopher-Kings, and Eudaimonism.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 22(1):185–219.10.1163/22134417-90000084Search in Google Scholar
Rosen, S. 2005. Plato’sRepublic:A Study. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1973. “The Analogy of City and Soul in Plato’s Republic.” In Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, edited by E. N. Lee et al., 196–206. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum and Co.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
