Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter October 5, 2023

Kant’s Rationalist Account of Hope

  • Joe Stratmann EMAIL logo

Abstract

Few fates seem worse than living without cause for hope. Yet what is it to have a cause for hope? And how is it related to having hope? Although these questions have received relatively little philosophical attention, I argue that Kant advances a rationalist account of hope that addresses them. My central thesis has two parts. First, hope is a rational attitude for Kant; certain rational conditions are needed to differentiate hope from other desiderative attitudes (such as mere wishing or fantasizing). Second, these rational conditions involve causal inferences made by the hoping agent. To hope, an agent must make certain inferences about the cause of her desire and the cause of her belief that the object of her desire is possible. In short, to hope requires an agent to take herself to have a cause for hope.

Adelung, J. C. 1793. Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Breitkopf.Search in Google Scholar

Blöser, C. 2019. ‘Hope in Kant.’ In C. Blöser and T. Stahl (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Hope. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Bovens, L. 1999. ‘The Value of Hope.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59, 667–681.10.2307/2653787Search in Google Scholar

Chignell, A. 2007. ‘Belief in Kant.’ Philosophical Review 116(3), 323–360.10.1215/00318108-2007-001Search in Google Scholar

— . 2014. ‘Rational Hope, Possibility, and Divine Action.’ In G. Michalson (ed.), Religion with the Bounds of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 98–117.Search in Google Scholar

— . 2020. ‘Hope and Despair at the Kantian Chicken Factory: Moral Arguments about Making a Difference.’ In L. Allais & J. Callanan (eds), Kant and Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–238.Search in Google Scholar

— . 2021. ‘Knowledge, Anxiety, Hope: How Kant’s First and Third Questions Relate.’ In Himmelmann, B. and Serck-Hanssen, C. (eds.), The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Kant Congress. Berlin: De Gruyter. 127–149.Search in Google Scholar

Cureton, A. 2018. ‘Reasonable Hope in Kant’s Ethics.’ Kantian Review 23(2), 181–203.10.1017/S136941541800002XSearch in Google Scholar

Day, J. P. 1969. ‘Hope.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 6(2), 89–102.Search in Google Scholar

Downie, R. S. 1963. ‘Hope.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24(2), 248–251.10.2307/2104466Search in Google Scholar

Flikschuh, K. 2009. ‘Hope as Prudence: Practical Faith in Kant’s Political Thinking.’ International Yearbook of German Idealism 7, 95–117.10.1515/9783110208788.1.95Search in Google Scholar

Hare, J. 1996. The Moral Gap. Kantian Ethics, Human Limits and God’s Assistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. 1994. Leviathan. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, D. 2009. ‘Three Kinds of Rationalism and the Non-Spatiality of Things in Themselves.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 47(3), 355–382.10.1353/hph.0.0130Search in Google Scholar

Insole, C. 2008. ‘The Irreducible Importance of Religious Hope in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.’ Philosophy 83(3), 333–351.10.1017/S0031819108000703Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. 2002. ‘Happiness as a Natural End.’ In M. Timmons (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 317–330.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1996a. Practical Philosophy. Trans. and Ed. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

— . 1996b. Religion and Rational Theology. Trans. and Ed. A. Wood and G. Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

— . 1997. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and Ed. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

— . 2012. Lectures on Anthropology. Trans. and Ed. R. Louden and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kohl, M. 2015. ‘Kant and ‘Ought Implies Can.’’ Philosophical Quarterly 65(261), 690–710.10.1093/pq/pqv044Search in Google Scholar

— . 2017. ‘The Normativity of Prudence.’ Kant-Studien 108(4), 517–542.Search in Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1965. ‘Causes and Conditions.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 2(4), 245–264.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, A. 2014. How We Hope: A Moral Psychology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691151526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

McCammon, C. 2006. ‘Overcoming Deism: Hope Incarnate in Kant’s Rational Religion.’ In C. Firestone and S. Palmquist (eds.), Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 79–89.Search in Google Scholar

Meirav, A. 2009. ‘The Nature of Hope.’ Ratio 22(2), 216–233.10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00427.xSearch in Google Scholar

Milona, M. 2019. ‘Finding Hope.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49(5), 710–29.10.1080/00455091.2018.1435612Search in Google Scholar

Milona, M. and Stockdale, K. 2018. ‘A Perceptual Theory of Hope.’ Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5(8), 203–222.10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.008Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, O. 1997. ‘Kant on Reason and Religion.’ In G. B. Patterson (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 18. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 269–308.Search in Google Scholar

Pettit, P. 2004. ‘Hope and its Place in Mind.’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1, 152–165.10.1177/0002716203261798Search in Google Scholar

Price, H. 1969. Belief. London: Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, P. 1982. ‘Kant’s Doctrine of Hope: Reason’s Interest and the Things of Faith.’ New Scholasticism 56, 228–238.10.5840/newscholas198256231Search in Google Scholar

Schafer, K. 2023. Kant’s Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192868534.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Stockdale, K. 2019. ‘Emotional Hope.’ In C. Blöser & T. Stahl (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Hope. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 115–133.Search in Google Scholar

Sticker, M. and Saunders, J. (forthcoming). ‘Why We Go Wrong: Beyond Kant’s Dichotomy between Duty and Self-love.’ Inquiry.Search in Google Scholar

Tolley, C. 2017. ‘Kant on the Place of Cognition in the Progression of our Representations.’ Synthese 197(8): 3215–3244.10.1007/s11229-017-1625-3Search in Google Scholar

Wheatley, J. M. O. 1958. ‘Wishing and Hoping.’ Analysis 18(6), 121–131.10.1093/analys/18.6.121Search in Google Scholar

Willaschek, M. 2018. Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108560856Search in Google Scholar

Wood, A. 1970. Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

— . 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zuckert, R. 2018. ‘Is Kantian Hope a Feeling?’ In K. Sorensen and D. Williamson (eds.), Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 242–259.10.1017/9781316823453.014Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-10-05

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2022-0057/html
Scroll to top button