Skip to main content

Plant Ethics and Climate Change

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Philosophy ((HP))

  • 511 Accesses

Abstract

Plant ethics is a field of philosophy that discusses the moral value of plants, and individual responsibilities toward them. As anthropogenic climate change is likely to have devastating effects on plants, a plant ethics analysis of climate change is crucial to fully understand the extent of people’s responsibilities toward plants. However, surprisingly little has been written on this topic. This chapter aims to provide an overview of the main positions in plant ethics as well as an initial exploration of the following three salient questions concerning plant ethics and climate change. First, how stringent are people’s responsibilities to preserve plants? Second, do people have responsibilities to plant trees? Third, do people have responsibilities to help plant migration? Plant ethics theories struggle to different extent with each of these questions. On all theories, people have great responsibilities to preserve, if not individual plants, at least large forests, and on most theories people have some responsibility to help plant migration. On whether there are responsibilities to plant trees, different plant ethics theories deliver widely different results, from there being no responsibility to plant any tree to there being responsibility to plant as many trees as possible. All three questions are venues for future research in plant ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alves, B. (2023, January 31). Resident population in the Legal Amazon area in Brazil from 1970 to 2021. Available at statista.com: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251314/amazon-population-brazil/. Last visited 15 Jan 2023.

  • Attfield, R. (1981). The good of trees. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 15, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attfield, R. (1984). Value in the wilderness. Metaphilosophy, 15(3-4), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attfield, R. (1991). Ethics of environmental concern (2nd ed.). University of Georgia Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Attfield, R. (2018). Forest ethics. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 121–131). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baluška, F., Mancuso, S., Volkmann, D., & Barlow, P. W. (2008). The ‘root-brain’ hypothesis of Charles and Francis Darwin. Revival after more than 125 years. Plant Signal Behavior, 4(12), 1121–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner, R. (1992). Weathering, plants, and the long-term carbon cycle. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 56(8), 3225–3231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binskin, M., Bennett, A., & Macintosh, A. (2020). Royal commission into natural disaster arrangements. Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchers Arriagada, N., Bowman, D., Palmer, A., & Johnston, F. (2019). Climate change, wildfires, heatwaves and health impacts in Australia. In R. Akhtar (Ed.), Extreme weather events and human health (pp. 99–116). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueren, E., & Struik, P. (2005). Integrity and rights of plants: Ethical notions in organic plant breeding and propagation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18(5), 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., & Darwin, F. (1880). The power of movement of plants. John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1993). Life's dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. Alfred Knorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECNH (Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology). (2008). The dignity of living beings with regard to plants: Moral consideration of plants for their own sake. Ackermanndruck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, M. (2006). Plants, medicines and man. Journal of the Science of Food and Agricolture, 86(12), 1797–1804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S. (2010). Is ‘arming the future’ with geoengineering really the lesser evil? Some doubts about the ethics of intentionally manipulating the climate system. In S. Gardiner, S. Caney, & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Climate ethics (pp. 284–313). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S. (2019). Ethics and geoengineering: An overview. In I. L. Valera & J. Costilla (Eds.), Global changes. Ethics, politics and environment in the contemporary technological world (pp. 69–78). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geographic Area Coordination Center (GACC). (2023). National large incident year-to-date report date: 12/21/2020. Available at Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201229021815/https://gacc.nifc.gov/sacc/predictive/intelligence/NationalLargeIncidentYTDReport.pdf. Last visited 15 Jan 2023.

  • Hall, M. (2011). Plants as persons: A philosophical botany. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, K.-T., Ruan, L.-W., & Liao, L.-S. (2022). Effects of indoor plants on human functions: A systematic review with meta-analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L. (2017). Climate engineering and the playing god critique. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herms, D. A., & McCullough, G. D. (2014). Emerald Ash Borer invasion of North America: History, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annual Review of Entomology, 59, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiernaux, Q. (2021). The ethics of plant flourishing and agricultural ethics: Theoretical distinctions and concrete recommendations in light of the environmental crisis. Philosophies, 6(91). https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6040091

  • Johnson, L. E. (1993). Morally deep world: An essay on moral significance and environmental ethics (New ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallhoff, A. (2014). Plants in ethics: Why flourishing deserves moral respect. Environmental Values, 23, 685–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallhoff, A. (2018). The flourishing of plants: A neo-Aristotelian approach to plant ethics. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 51–58). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kallhoff, A., Pellegrino, G., & Di Paola, M. (2018). Introduction. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 1–10). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karafyllis, N. (2018). “Hey plants, take a walk on the wild side!” the ethics of seeds and seed banks. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 188–203). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl, J. (2006). Geoengineering climate change: Treating the symptom over the cause. Climate Change, 77, 227–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1961). A sand county Almanac and sketches here and there (Enlarged ed.). Oxford University Press, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn, T. M., & Prado, P. I. (2005). How many species are there in Brazil? Conservation Biology, 19(3), 619–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, T. E., & Nobre, C. (2018). Amazon tipping point. Science Advances, 4(2), eaat2340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lughadha, E. N., Bachman, S. P., Leão, T. C., & Félix Forest, J. M.-G. (2020). Extinction risk and threats to plants and fungi. Plants People Planet, 2(5), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso, S., & Viola, A. (2015). Brilliant green: The surprising history and science of plant intelligence. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris, V. (2014). Nature à vendre. Limites des services écosystémiques. Quae.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, J. (2009). Asymmetries in the morality of causing people to exist. In M. Roberts & W. David (Eds.), Harming future persons ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1922). The conception of intrinsic value. Philosophical Studies, 107, 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, K., & Vinicius, T. (2003). Amazon rainforest: Biodiversity and biopiracy. Student BioMedic Journal, 386–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, R. P., Pitelka, L. F., Solomon, A. M., Nathan, R., Midgley, G. F., Fragoso, J. M., & Heike Lischke, K. T. (2005). Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. Bioscience, 55(0), 749–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odparlik, S. (2018). The dignity of plants. An overview of the discussion in German-speaking countries. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 59–60). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pamplany, A., Gordijn, B., & Brereton, P. (2020). The ethics of geoengineering: A literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 3069–3119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, G. (2018). The value of plants. On the axiology of plants. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 13–29). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouteau, S. (2014). Beyond “second animals”: Making sense of plant ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillantilla, M., Leòn, A. G., & Josse, C. (2022). The Amazon against the clock: A regional assessment on where and how to protect 80% by 2025. COICA (Coordinadoira de las Organizaciones Indigenas de la Cuenca Amazonica), RAISG (Rede Amazônica de Informação Socioambiental), STAND.earth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H., III. (1988). Duties to and values in the natural world. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society. (2009). Geoengineering the climate science, governance and uncertainty. Excellence in Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, R. (2018). Is considering the interests of plants absurd? In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 40–50). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schörgenhumer, M. (2018). Caring for plants: Cultivating relational virtues. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 110–130). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Segundo-Ortin, M., & Calvo, P. (2021). Consciousness and cognition in plants. WIREs Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), e1578. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staal, A., Tuinenburg, O. A., Bosmans, J. H., Holmgren, M., Nes, E. H., Scheffer, M., Zemp, D. C., & Dekker, S. C. (2018). Forest-rainfall cascades buffer against drought across the Amazon. Nature Climate Change, 8, 539–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. D. (2010). Should trees have standing?: Law, morality, and the environment (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vines, T., Bruce, A., & Faunce, T. A. (2013). Planetary medicine and the Waitangi tribunal Whanganui river report: Global Health law embracing ecosystems as patients. Journal of Law and Medicine, 20, 528–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Višak, T. (2018). Utilitarian plant ethics. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 30–39). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. P., Abatzoglou, J. T., Gershunov, A., Guzman-Morales, J., Bishop, D. A., Balch, J. K., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2019). Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earth’s Future, 7(9), 892–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am thankful to Mattia Cecchinato, Enrico Galvagni, Theron Pummer, Emilia Wilson, and the reviewer for their comments on this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Stroppa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Stroppa, L. (2023). Plant Ethics and Climate Change. In: Pellegrino, G., Di Paola, M. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_73

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics