Abstract
Plant ethics is a field of philosophy that discusses the moral value of plants, and individual responsibilities toward them. As anthropogenic climate change is likely to have devastating effects on plants, a plant ethics analysis of climate change is crucial to fully understand the extent of people’s responsibilities toward plants. However, surprisingly little has been written on this topic. This chapter aims to provide an overview of the main positions in plant ethics as well as an initial exploration of the following three salient questions concerning plant ethics and climate change. First, how stringent are people’s responsibilities to preserve plants? Second, do people have responsibilities to plant trees? Third, do people have responsibilities to help plant migration? Plant ethics theories struggle to different extent with each of these questions. On all theories, people have great responsibilities to preserve, if not individual plants, at least large forests, and on most theories people have some responsibility to help plant migration. On whether there are responsibilities to plant trees, different plant ethics theories deliver widely different results, from there being no responsibility to plant any tree to there being responsibility to plant as many trees as possible. All three questions are venues for future research in plant ethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alves, B. (2023, January 31). Resident population in the Legal Amazon area in Brazil from 1970 to 2021. Available at statista.com: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251314/amazon-population-brazil/. Last visited 15 Jan 2023.
Attfield, R. (1981). The good of trees. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 15, 35–54.
Attfield, R. (1984). Value in the wilderness. Metaphilosophy, 15(3-4), 289–304.
Attfield, R. (1991). Ethics of environmental concern (2nd ed.). University of Georgia Press.
Attfield, R. (2018). Forest ethics. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 121–131). Routledge.
Baluška, F., Mancuso, S., Volkmann, D., & Barlow, P. W. (2008). The ‘root-brain’ hypothesis of Charles and Francis Darwin. Revival after more than 125 years. Plant Signal Behavior, 4(12), 1121–1127.
Berner, R. (1992). Weathering, plants, and the long-term carbon cycle. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 56(8), 3225–3231.
Binskin, M., Bennett, A., & Macintosh, A. (2020). Royal commission into natural disaster arrangements. Commonwealth of Australia.
Borchers Arriagada, N., Bowman, D., Palmer, A., & Johnston, F. (2019). Climate change, wildfires, heatwaves and health impacts in Australia. In R. Akhtar (Ed.), Extreme weather events and human health (pp. 99–116). Springer.
Bueren, E., & Struik, P. (2005). Integrity and rights of plants: Ethical notions in organic plant breeding and propagation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18(5), 479–493.
Darwin, C., & Darwin, F. (1880). The power of movement of plants. John Murray.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life's dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. Alfred Knorf.
ECNH (Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology). (2008). The dignity of living beings with regard to plants: Moral consideration of plants for their own sake. Ackermanndruck.
Fowler, M. (2006). Plants, medicines and man. Journal of the Science of Food and Agricolture, 86(12), 1797–1804.
Gardiner, S. (2010). Is ‘arming the future’ with geoengineering really the lesser evil? Some doubts about the ethics of intentionally manipulating the climate system. In S. Gardiner, S. Caney, & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Climate ethics (pp. 284–313). Oxford University Press.
Gardiner, S. (2019). Ethics and geoengineering: An overview. In I. L. Valera & J. Costilla (Eds.), Global changes. Ethics, politics and environment in the contemporary technological world (pp. 69–78). Springer.
Geographic Area Coordination Center (GACC). (2023). National large incident year-to-date report date: 12/21/2020. Available at Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201229021815/https://gacc.nifc.gov/sacc/predictive/intelligence/NationalLargeIncidentYTDReport.pdf. Last visited 15 Jan 2023.
Hall, M. (2011). Plants as persons: A philosophical botany. State University of New York Press.
Han, K.-T., Ruan, L.-W., & Liao, L.-S. (2022). Effects of indoor plants on human functions: A systematic review with meta-analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7454.
Hartman, L. (2017). Climate engineering and the playing god critique. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 313–333.
Herms, D. A., & McCullough, G. D. (2014). Emerald Ash Borer invasion of North America: History, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annual Review of Entomology, 59, 13–30.
Hiernaux, Q. (2021). The ethics of plant flourishing and agricultural ethics: Theoretical distinctions and concrete recommendations in light of the environmental crisis. Philosophies, 6(91). https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6040091
Johnson, L. E. (1993). Morally deep world: An essay on moral significance and environmental ethics (New ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Kallhoff, A. (2014). Plants in ethics: Why flourishing deserves moral respect. Environmental Values, 23, 685–700.
Kallhoff, A. (2018). The flourishing of plants: A neo-Aristotelian approach to plant ethics. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 51–58). Routledge.
Kallhoff, A., Pellegrino, G., & Di Paola, M. (2018). Introduction. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
Karafyllis, N. (2018). “Hey plants, take a walk on the wild side!” the ethics of seeds and seed banks. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 188–203). Routledge.
Kiehl, J. (2006). Geoengineering climate change: Treating the symptom over the cause. Climate Change, 77, 227–228.
Leopold, A. (1961). A sand county Almanac and sketches here and there (Enlarged ed.). Oxford University Press, U.S.A.
Lewinsohn, T. M., & Prado, P. I. (2005). How many species are there in Brazil? Conservation Biology, 19(3), 619–624.
Lovejoy, T. E., & Nobre, C. (2018). Amazon tipping point. Science Advances, 4(2), eaat2340.
Lughadha, E. N., Bachman, S. P., Leão, T. C., & Félix Forest, J. M.-G. (2020). Extinction risk and threats to plants and fungi. Plants People Planet, 2(5), 389–408.
Mancuso, S., & Viola, A. (2015). Brilliant green: The surprising history and science of plant intelligence. Island Press.
Maris, V. (2014). Nature à vendre. Limites des services écosystémiques. Quae.
McMahan, J. (2009). Asymmetries in the morality of causing people to exist. In M. Roberts & W. David (Eds.), Harming future persons ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem. Springer.
Moore, G. (1922). The conception of intrinsic value. Philosophical Studies, 107, 23–44.
Morales, K., & Vinicius, T. (2003). Amazon rainforest: Biodiversity and biopiracy. Student BioMedic Journal, 386–387.
Nielson, R. P., Pitelka, L. F., Solomon, A. M., Nathan, R., Midgley, G. F., Fragoso, J. M., & Heike Lischke, K. T. (2005). Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. Bioscience, 55(0), 749–759.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Belknap Press.
Odparlik, S. (2018). The dignity of plants. An overview of the discussion in German-speaking countries. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 59–60). Routledge.
Pamplany, A., Gordijn, B., & Brereton, P. (2020). The ethics of geoengineering: A literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 3069–3119.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press USA.
Pellegrino, G. (2018). The value of plants. On the axiology of plants. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 13–29). Routledge.
Pouteau, S. (2014). Beyond “second animals”: Making sense of plant ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27, 1–25.
Quillantilla, M., Leòn, A. G., & Josse, C. (2022). The Amazon against the clock: A regional assessment on where and how to protect 80% by 2025. COICA (Coordinadoira de las Organizaciones Indigenas de la Cuenca Amazonica), RAISG (Rede Amazônica de Informação Socioambiental), STAND.earth.
Rolston, H., III. (1988). Duties to and values in the natural world. Temple University Press.
Royal Society. (2009). Geoengineering the climate science, governance and uncertainty. Excellence in Science.
Sandler, R. (2018). Is considering the interests of plants absurd? In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 40–50). Routledge.
Schörgenhumer, M. (2018). Caring for plants: Cultivating relational virtues. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 110–130). Routledge.
Segundo-Ortin, M., & Calvo, P. (2021). Consciousness and cognition in plants. WIREs Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), e1578. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1578
Staal, A., Tuinenburg, O. A., Bosmans, J. H., Holmgren, M., Nes, E. H., Scheffer, M., Zemp, D. C., & Dekker, S. C. (2018). Forest-rainfall cascades buffer against drought across the Amazon. Nature Climate Change, 8, 539–543.
Stone, C. D. (2010). Should trees have standing?: Law, morality, and the environment (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Vines, T., Bruce, A., & Faunce, T. A. (2013). Planetary medicine and the Waitangi tribunal Whanganui river report: Global Health law embracing ecosystems as patients. Journal of Law and Medicine, 20, 528–541.
Višak, T. (2018). Utilitarian plant ethics. In A. Kallhoff, M. Di Paola, & M. Schörgenhumer (Eds.), Plant ethics concepts and applications (pp. 30–39). Routledge.
Williams, A. P., Abatzoglou, J. T., Gershunov, A., Guzman-Morales, J., Bishop, D. A., Balch, J. K., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2019). Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earth’s Future, 7(9), 892–910.
Acknowledgments
I am thankful to Mattia Cecchinato, Enrico Galvagni, Theron Pummer, Emilia Wilson, and the reviewer for their comments on this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Stroppa, L. (2023). Plant Ethics and Climate Change. In: Pellegrino, G., Di Paola, M. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_73
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_73
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07001-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07002-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities