Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pockets of peasantness: small-scale agricultural producers in the Central Finger Lakes region of upstate New York

  • Symposium/Special Issue
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some farmers in the Central Finger Lakes Region of New York balance their production between principles of peasant farming and capitalist farming. They struggle to extend their sphere of autonomy and subsistence production, while extended commodity production is often a response to external forces of the state and capital. This struggle, together with a quantitative increase of small farms, can be described as an instance of repeasantization. Based on inductive, empirical qualitative social research, this case study describes the economy and social organization of six farms in the area under investigation and explores the applicability of the rich theory of peasant farming to agriculture in this community. Besides selling commodities to pay for many farming inputs and consumer goods, the farms produce for their subsistence and that of their community. They exchange products and services with other farms, they build networks of mutual provisioning, support, and mentorship, and try to take good care of the land. This paper shows that subsistence production and peasant culture are not restricted to the past or the Global South, but also exist as pockets of peasantness on six New York farms. The perspective applied in this paper suggests that principles of peasant farming may shape farming on other US farms, too, if we accept that these principles intersect with constrains of the larger capitalist market society in which they are embedded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. or consubstantiality, as Gray (1998) calls it.

  2. Note that there are many more definitions of peasants or peasantries used in different contexts. See Edelman (2013) for a comprehensive review.

  3. Likewise, I emphasize my positionality and personal learning story throughout this paper as a means for you, reader, to situate the interpretation of my findings.

  4. At the other two farms, I was not able to participate due to my lack of training with specialized equipment.

  5. Bernstein (2010) argues that this is precisely why the peasantry ceased to exist. There is just no escape from engaging in capitalistic behavior. Although this observation is well taken, it does not distinguish between farmers who use these tactics for accumulation as an end in itself, or as a way to obtain the means for their simple reproduction.

  6. Considering that identity, well-being, and capacities to act collectively are actively produced (through cooperation either based on shared labor or exchange of material goods) through labor, it would be more appropriate to talk about these values as more-than-material instead of more-than-economic.

References

  • Agar, M.H. 1996. The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E.R. 2016. The practice of social research, 14th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennhold-Thomsen, V. 2006. Subsistenzwirtschaft, Globalwirtschaft, Regionalwirtschaft. In Lebensweltökonomie in Zeiten wirtschaftlicher Globalisierung, ed. M.A. Jochimsen and U. Knobloch, 65–88. Bielefeld, Germany: Kleine Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennholdt-Thomsen, V., and M. Mies. 1999. The subsistence perspective. Beyond the globalized economy. New York, NY: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. 2010. Class dynamics of agrarian change. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, A. 1987. Small farms: Persistence with legitimation. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M. 2012. The moneyless manifesto. East Meon, Hampshire, UK: Permanent Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayanov, A.V. 1966. The theory of peasant economy. Homewood, IL: American Economic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. 2013. What is a peasant? What are peasantries? A briefing paper on issues of definition. Prepared for the first session of the Intergovernmental Working Group on a United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, Geneva, 15–19 July 2013.

  • Ekers, M., C.Z. Levkoe, S. Walker, and B. Dale. 2016. Will work for food: Agricultural interns, apprentices, volunteers, and the agrarian question. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (3): 705–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, S.B. 2015. Independence and individualism: Conflated values in farmer cooperation? Agriculture and Human Values 32 (1): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, S.B., J. Forney, and S. Wynne-Jones. 2017. The more-than-economic dimensions of cooperation in food production. Journal of Rural Studies 53: 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, H. 1978. World market state and family farms: Social bases of household production in the era of wage labor. Comparative Studies in Sociology and History 20 (4): 544–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J.K. 1996. The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2008. Diverse economies: Performative practices for `other worlds. Progress in Human Geography 32 (5): 613–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. 1998. Family farms in the Scottish borders: A practical definition by hill sheep farmers. Journal of Rural Studies 14 (3): 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, R. 1977. Introduction: The substantive economy in peasant societies. In Peasant livelihoods, ed. R. Halperin and J. Dow, 2–16. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, K. 1988. The Agrarian Question. (trans: P. Burgess). Winchester, MA: Swan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, T., G. Stevenson, and R. Welsh. 2008. Food and the mid-level farm: Renewing an agriculture of the middle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S.A., and J.M. Dickinson. 1978. Obstacles to the development of a capitalist agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies 5 (4): 466–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1977. Capital. critique of political economy. (trans: B. Fowkes), vol. 1–2. New York, NY: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., and P. Stock. 2018. Repeasantisation in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis 58 (1): 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd ed. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1957. The economy as instituted process. In Trade and market in the early empires Economies in history and theory, ed. K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg, and H. Pearson, 243–270. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, N. 1988. Our daily bread: the peasant question and family farming in the Colombian Andes. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, N., and P. Barlett. 1989. The persistence of family farms in United States agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 29 (3–4): 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W.W. 1960. The stages of economic growth. A non-Communist manifesto. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, P.V. 2007. ‘Good farmers’ as reflexive producers: An examination of family organic farmers in the US midwest. Sociologia Ruralis 47 (2): 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, P.V., and J. Forney. 2014. Farmer autonomy and the farming self. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, P.V., J. Forney, S.B. Emery, and H. Wittman. 2014. Neoliberal natures on the farm: Farmer autonomy and cooperation in comparative perspective. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, P.V., M.S. Carolan, and C.J. Rosin. 2015. Food utopias: Reimagining citizenship, ethics and community. Abingdon, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C. 1991. Economics of environmental conservation. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau 1945. U.S. Census of Agriculture. New York State and County Data. Suitland, MD: United States Bureau of the Census.

  • USDA, ed. 2007. U.S. Census of Agriculture. New York State and County Data. Washington, D.C.: National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

  • USDA, ed. 2012. U.S. Census of Agriculture. New York State and County Data. Washington, D.C.: National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

  • Van der Ploeg, J.D. 2008. The new peasantries. Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London, UK: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., and C. Tisdell. 2001. Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs. Ecological Economics 39 (3): 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E.O. 2010. Envisioning real utopias. London, UK: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. 2018. Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been made possible by a travel grant provided by University of Natural Resource and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU). During the fieldwork, the Department of Development Sociology, Cornell University hosted me as a visiting scholar. I thank Veronika Bennholdt-Thomsen and Rachel Bezner Kerr for their supervision and guidance. I would also like to thank Julie Dawson, Alicia Swords, and four anonymous reviewers for feedback. In particular, I would like to thank the farmers in this study for taking the time to participate and continuing their inspiring work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johann Strube.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strube, J. Pockets of peasantness: small-scale agricultural producers in the Central Finger Lakes region of upstate New York. Agric Hum Values 36, 837–848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09944-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09944-z

Keywords

Navigation