Skip to main content
Log in

The social construction of genetic abnormality: Ethical implications for managerial decisions in the workplace

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines moral issues concerning a firm's use of genetic information about a prospective employee's predisposition to contract occupational and other illnesses. It critically reviews leading social construction literature on genetic abnormality and genetic screening, and it examines the relevance of arguments from justice and meritocratic principles. It concludes that there is a strong moral presumption against genetic screening in employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashford, N. A., C. J. Spaldfor, D. B. Hattis, and C. C. Caldart: 1990,Monitoring the Worker for Exposure and Disease (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, E.: 1991,Risky Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R.: 1977,Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press).

  • Feinberg, J.: 1970,Doing and Deserving (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L.: 1991, ‘Genetic Discrimination: The Use of Genetically Based Diagnostic and Prognostic Tests by Employers and Insurers’,American Journal of Law and Medicine 17, 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1992, ‘The Self-vindication of the Laboratory Science’, in Pickering (ed.),Science as Practice and Science as Culture, pp. 29–64.

  • Jasanoff, S.: 1992, ‘What Judges Should Know About the Sociology of Science’,Jurimetrics Journal 32, 344–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G.: 1992, ‘Disability and the Right to Work’,Social Philosophy and Policy 9, 262–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. and L. Tancredi: 1989,Dangerous Diagnostics (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (ed.): 1992,Science as Practice and as Culture (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, N.: (in press), ‘Facts, Artifacts, and Mesonomes: Practicing Epistemology With the Electron Microscope’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science.

  • Rawls, J.: 1971,A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strudler, A.: 1990, ‘The Testing Mentality’,Technology Review 3, 77–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment: 1990,Genetic Monitoring and Screening in the Workplace, OTA-BA-455 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Statutes at Large: 1993,Americans With Disabilities Act, Public Law 101–336, 101st Congress, Second session.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Alan Strudler is Research Scholar at the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at the University of Maryland, College Park. He has taught philosophy at Stanford University and California Institute of Technology. His recent writing on professional and corporate responsibility appears inMichigan Law Review andLaw and Philosophy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strudler, A. The social construction of genetic abnormality: Ethical implications for managerial decisions in the workplace. J Bus Ethics 13, 839–848 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871697

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871697

Keywords

Navigation