Skip to main content
Log in

Some remarks on classical representations of quantum mechanics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that, to a certain extent, the statistical framework of Hilbert-space quantum mechanics can be reformulated in classical terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. F. O'Connell, “The Wigner distribution function—50th birthday,”Found. Phys. 13, 83–92 (1983); M. Hillery, R. F. O'Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, “Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals,”Phys. Rep. 106, 121–167 (1984); E. C. G. Sudarshan, “Perception of quantum systems,” inOld and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology, A. van der Merwe, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1983), pp. 457–467.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. T. Ali and E. Prugovečki, “Systems of imprimitivity and representations of quantum mechanics on fuzzy phase spaces,”J. Math. Phys. 18, 219–228 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. T. Ali and E. Prugovečki, “Classical and quantum statistical mechanics in a common Liouville space,”Physica A 89, 501–521 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Guz, “Foundations of phase-space quantum mechanics,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 23, 157–184 (1984); “Stochastic phase spaces, fuzzy sets, and statistical metric spaces,”Found. Phys. 14, 821–848 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. E. Schroeck, Jr., “The transitions among classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and stochastic quantum mechanics,”Found. Phys. 12, 825–841 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Gudder, “Probability manifolds,”J. Math. Phys. 25, 2397–2401 (1984); “Amplitude phase-space model for quantum mechanics,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 24, 343–353 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Pitowsky, “Deterministic model of spin and statistics,”Phys. Rev. D 27, 2316–2335 (1983);Quantum Probability—Quantum Logic (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 321) (Springer, Berlin, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Stulpe, “On the representation of quantum mechanics on phase space,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31, 1785–1795 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Singer and W. Stulpe, “Phase-space representations of general statistical physical theories,”J. Math. Phys. 33, 131–142 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Busch and P. J. Lahti, “The determination of the past and the future of a physical system in quantum mechanics,”Found. Phys. 19, 633–678 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Busch, K.-E. Hellwig, and W. Stulpe, “On classical representations of finite-dimensional quantum mechanics,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 32, 399–405 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stulpe, W. Some remarks on classical representations of quantum mechanics. Found Phys 24, 1089–1094 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054650

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054650

Keywords

Navigation