Abstract
The author argues for the importance of non-Markovian causality in the social sciences because Markovian conditions often cannot be satisfied. Two theorems giving conditions for non-Markovian causes to be transitive are proved. Applications of non-Markovian causality in psychology and economics are outlined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eells, E. and Sober, E.: 1983, ‘Probabilistic Causality and the Question of Transitivity’, Philosophy of Science 50, 33–57.
Estes, W. K. and Suppes, P.: 1959, Foundations of Statistical Learning Theory, II, The Stimulus Sampling Model, Tech. Rep. 26, Stanford University, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences.
Friedman, M.: 1957, A Theory of the Consumption Function, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
Granger, C. W. J.: 1969, ‘Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cost-Spectral Methods’, Econometrica 37, 424–438.
Hall, R. E. and Mishkin, F. S.: 1982, ‘The Sensitivity of Consumption to Transitory Income: Estimates from Panel Data on Households’, Econometrica 50, 461–481.
Malinvaud, E.: 1966, Statistical Methods of Econometrics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Norman, M. F.: 1972, Markov Processes and Learning Models, Academic Press, New York.
Sims, C. A.: 1972, ‘Money, Income, and Causality’, The American Economic Review 62, 540–552.
Suppes, P.: 1970, A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suppes, P. Non-Markovian causality in the social sciences with some theorems on transitivity. Synthese 68, 129–140 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413969
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413969