E-LOGOS 2023, 30(1):14-20 | DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.497

Philosophical Discourse on Image and Text (A Historical Analysis of Image and Text Relationship)

Anastasia Jessica Adinda Susanti
Doctoral School of Philosophy, University of Szeged, Hungary

The relationship between image and text has been a topic of debate since the Ancient Greek era. Plato considered image as more natural than text, therefore the image is readily understood. Simónides de Ceos has begun the sister arts tradition between image and text, by his phrase ut pictura poesis (as is painting, so is poetry). In contrast to the Ancient Greek, Modern thinkers tend to sharply distinguish between image and text. We can trace modern philosophical discourse on image and text from Leonardo da Vinci’s superiority of painting over poetry, Lessing’s distinction of painting and poetry, Burke’s words as the sublime medium, Clement Greenberg’s and Michael Fried’s medium specificity, to Rosalind Krauss’s grid of modern art. This study examines discourse on image and text relationship in the historical analysis view. Eventually, the researcher attempts to answer the problem of image and text relationship, in the light of contemporary and multimodality theories.

Keywords: Image, Text, Ancient Greek, Modern, Multimodality

Received: January 31, 2022; Revised: January 31, 2022; Accepted: August 18, 2023; Prepublished online: August 18, 2023; Published: August 31, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Susanti, A.J.A. (2023). Philosophical Discourse on Image and Text (A Historical Analysis of Image and Text Relationship). E-LOGOS30(1), 14-20. doi: 10.18267/j.e-logos.497
Download citation

References

  1. Aquinas, Thomas. (1947). Summa Theologica. New York: Benziger Bros.
  2. Aristotle. (2011). De Anima. Translated with Introduction and Notes Mark Shiffman. Newburyport, Focus Publishing.
  3. Augustine. (2002). The Confessions of Saint Augustine. Translated by E. B. Pusey (Edward Bouverie). Project Gutenberg. (Digital version). https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3296/3296-h/3296-h.htm
  4. Bateman, John. A. (2014). Text and Image, A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. London and New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  5. Burke, Edmund. (1909). A Philosophical Inquiry Into The Origin Of Our Ideas Of The Sublime And Beautiful With Several Other Additions. New York, P.F. Collier & Son Company.
  6. Çoºkun, Gül Esra. (2015). "Use Of Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis In Media Studies", The Online Journal of Communication and Media - July, Volume 1, Issue 3.
  7. Da Vinci, Leonardo. (1500). "Paragone of Poetry and Painting". https://arthistoryproject.com/artists/leonardo-da-vinci/paragone-of-poetry-and-painting/
  8. Erwin, Timothy. (2017). "The Changing Patterns of Iconology: Seven Questions to Mitchell from the Twentieth Century" in Kre¹imir Purgar (ed.). W.J.T. Mitchell's Image Theory, Living Pictures. London and New York: Routledge.
  9. Fried, Michael. (1967). "Art and Objecthood". Artforum. Summer 1967, Vol. 5, No. 10. 50-64. The MIT Press.
  10. Golden, Leon. (2010). "Reception of Horace's Ars Poetica". In Davis, Gregson (ed.). A Companion to Horace. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  11. Gombrich, E.H. (1960). Art And Illusion, A Study In The Psychology Of Pictorial Representation. London: Phaidon Press.
  12. Goodman, Nelson. (1968). Languages of Art, An Approach to A Theory of Symbols. The USA: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
  13. Greenberg, Clement. (1940). Towards a Newer Laocoön. (digital version). https://west.slcschools.org/academics/visual-arts/documents/Laocoon.pdf
  14. Krauss, Rosalind. (2006). "Two Moments from the Post-Medium Condition". October 116, Spring, pp. 55-62. Go to original source...
  15. Kress, Gunther and Theo van Leeuwen. (2001). Multimodal Discourse, The modes and media of contemporary communication. London and New York: Arnold and Oxford University Press.
  16. Kress, Gunther. (2003). Literacy in New Media Age, London and New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  17. Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. (1887). Laocoön. An essay upon the limits of painting and poetry. Translated By Ellen Frothingham.. Boston: Roberts Brothers. (digital version). https://archive.org/stream/laocoonessayupon00lessrich/laocoonessayupon00lessrich_djvu.txt
  18. McLuhan, Marshall, Quentin Fiore, and Jerome Angel. (2001a). The Medium is the Massage, An invetory of effects. California: Gingko Press Inc.
  19. McLuhan, Marshall. (2001b).Understanding Media, The extensions of man. London and New York: Routledge Classics.
  20. Mecchia, Giuseppina. (2008). "(Review) The Future of the Image by Jacques Rancière and Gregory Elliot". Symplokē, Vol. 16, No. 1/2, pp. 313-316. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40550824. Go to original source...
  21. Mitchell, W.J.T. (1986). Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  22. Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994). Picture Theory. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  23. Mitchell, W.J.T. (2005). What do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  24. Mitchell, W.J.T. (2015). Image Science: Iconology, Visual Culture, and Media Aesthetics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  25. Plato. (2018). Cratylus. translated by Benjamin Jowett. (digital version: http://library.lol/main/6E6BB6B5EBDD1F64D14B7347410DE9B9)
  26. Plato. (1993). Republic. Translated by Robin Waterfield. New York: Oxford University Press.
  27. R.A. Markus. (1963). "Imago and Similitudo in Augustine", The University of Liverpool.
  28. Rancière, Jacques. (2007). The Future of the Image. Ed. and trans. Gregory Elliot. London and New York: Verso.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.